| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Should there be a build version with typedefs ? |
| No alias's are fine/better |
|
54% |
[ 6 ] |
| Maybe later as Version(STANDALONE_TYPESAFE) {...} |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
| Yes as Version(STANDALONE_TYPESAFE) {...} |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Yes as default with version(USE_ALIAS) {...} |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
| Yes as the only option |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 11 |
|
| Author |
Message |
l8night
Joined: 03 May 2004
Posts: 32
Location: UK
|
 Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 10:32 am Post subject: Alias -v- Typedef |
 |
|
I, Jcc7 and Walter are all of the opinion that there is no need for typedefs within the Win32 header, not everyone agrees.
I believe that the libraries by default should work with phobos and use alias's.
iff enough ppl want typedefs then I think we should include them, but as a version(STANDALONE_TYPESAFE) {...}
what do you all think ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aldacron
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 1322
Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
| Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This is akin to compiling a C Win32 app with/out #define STRICT. I'm of the opinion that if full compliance is what you're after, then using typedefs with version(STRICT) is the way to go. Otherwise, alias works fine for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
