FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

This project is now abandoned, right?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> DDoc
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Don Clugston



Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Germany (expat Australian)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 7:50 am    Post subject: This project is now abandoned, right? Reply with quote

Since DMD 0.132 introduced Ddoc into the compiler, there doesn't seem to be a need for this project any more. In any case, it can't be called ddoc.

It seems as though it has served its purpose -- Walter became convinced it was important. And he's used the name.

It would be nice to post a news item (or at least a forum post) about the fate of this project.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kris



Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 1494
Location: South Pacific

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is interesting that Walter 'stole' the name Smile

However ~ I doubt the D documenter will ever get to the stage where it's competitive with, say, doxygen. Therefore there would seem to be a need for a more sophisticated document builder (cross linking, code formatting, TOC, etc). Perhaps it would be valuable to use the XML produced by the D compiler from a documentation aspect, but the other attributes will still require much more work.

I think it would be worthwhile clarifying (with Walter) just how far he intends to take the D compiler documentation facilities. I suspect we'd find that it would be a somewhat minimalist approach.

My 2 cents.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jcc7



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 657
Location: Muskogee, OK, USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that it'd be a good idea to use XML output by DMD's Ddoc.

kris wrote:
I think it would be worthwhile clarifying (with Walter) just how far he intends to take the D compiler documentation facilities. I suspect we'd find that it would be a somewhat minimalist approach.


I suspect other than fixing bugs in the current implementation he's added the features that he wants to add.

For example, he doesn't seem interested in adding syntax highlighting for numbers (not that it'd be hard to do, but he doesn't see the need for it). I'm not saying that numbers have to be highlighted, but D2HTML has put numbers in a different color for years now, and I think it's a nice feature.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> DDoc All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group