View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
clayasaurus
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 857
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:44 pm Post subject: Submit Patches or Extensions here |
|
|
If you want me to review a patch or a new extension for ArcLib, post them here.
You can also simply email at 'clayasaurus' at 'gmail' dot 'com'
I check my email more often, but will eventually find the forums.
Last edited by clayasaurus on Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:42 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deadimp
Joined: 22 Oct 2008 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is simply a proposed change for the structure of extensions for arclib: (didn't know whether to put this here or in the Feature Request list)
Would it be too much of a hassle to structure the extensions so that they fall under "arc.$extension" or "arc.ext.$extension" just as derelict handles it? And as for the output library, either make it "arc-$extension" or "arc.$extension"?
If there' s a strong opposition against placing the includes under "arc", then maybe "arcext" or something along those lines.
It kind of sucks that the only way to do this is repeat the directory structure in each extension, but I guess that's what it takes...
[This stems from this post] _________________ deadimp.org
> MegaMan X Crossfire - MegaMan X fan game
Beginning D; Basic experience in PHP, C++, Java, C#, MySQL, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, VB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clayasaurus
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 857
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure putting it under arc.extname.* will cause problems.
I can, however, put it under arcExtname , or arcextname .
I'm leaning towards all lowercase. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deadimp
Joined: 22 Oct 2008 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the update!
Though, Derelict seems to be able to handle splits between OpenGL, SDL, OpenAL, etc. quite well using the convention "derelict.$extension_or_whatever_you_call_it" with no problems.
The only pain (which isn't too bad) in this case would be to make sure that for each extension, whereas the source was previously contained in $extension/ and then arc_$extension/, it would be contained in arc/$extension/.
IMHO, "arc.$extension" is more aesthetic than "arc_$extension", and plus requires a smaller overall domain (just "arc").
DSSS handles seamlessly, as seen with Derelict.
I guess I should have been more upfront with using this convention than just mention the other ways and not giving and good backing as to why to use this one.
[And as for the lowercase extensions, I think Walter stated somewhere that module names should always be lowercase for cross platform-ability, namely where case sensitive file systems come into play]
Once again, thanks! _________________ deadimp.org
> MegaMan X Crossfire - MegaMan X fan game
Beginning D; Basic experience in PHP, C++, Java, C#, MySQL, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, VB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clayasaurus
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 857
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's now arc.x.extname |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|