| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stonecobra
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 48
Location: Rough and Ready, CA
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:05 pm Post subject: Is Walnut still acitve? |
 |
|
| And if so, which version works well? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dan.lewis
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 69
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, still active. I haven't been checking the forums much anymore because few people stop by.
The best version to go with right now is 1.0 (the only tagged version). Version 1.x beyond that is for ActiveXObject development, which is partially complete. Version 2.x is a complete rewrite.
Help is always welcome. Best to contact me at murpsoft@hotmail.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
barrett9h
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 26
Location: Brazil
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The best way to check activity is Trac's timeline.
Last two months:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/walnut/timeline?from=02%2F06%2F08&daysback=60
seems alive.
PS: I just stumbled upon this project, and noted to missing important little things:
a) dates on the history section of the wiki;
b) "ECMAScript" in the project description. (You don't find "ecma" by searching dsource.org's project list page. Also, lower Google rank when searching for an ecma engine.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dan.lewis
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 69
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I tend to cyclically go hard for about 2-3 months and then abandon the project for about as long.
It's never dead, just sleeping.
_________________
nop
nop ; problem solved |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
