Author |
Message |
Topic: complex foreach agregators |
antonio
Replies: 10
Views: 23994
|
Forum: General Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:12 pm Subject: complex foreach agregators |
csauls wrote
I'm still iffy about the dot being used in these expression-indices (or whatever they'd end up being called), and that's one reason I propose the !
I always thought dot signifies "p ... |
Topic: complex foreach agregators |
antonio
Replies: 10
Views: 23994
|
Forum: General Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:43 pm Subject: complex foreach agregators |
Wow this is cool , you say this is going to be included in C# ?
Not really, I think this is an idea used into C "omega", an experimental language by Microsoft: they expose this as a XQUERY port to th ... |
Topic: complex foreach agregators |
antonio
Replies: 10
Views: 23994
|
Forum: General Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:14 pm Subject: complex foreach agregators |
I kind of like this, although I think there should be something in the syntax that makes it stick out. Instead of just
The main reason is to use an extension of the basic array functionallity.
... |
Topic: complex foreach agregators |
antonio
Replies: 10
Views: 23994
|
Forum: General Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:18 am Subject: complex foreach agregators |
and this?:
Person[] p = City[.name=="Madrid"].Population[.age>18 && .name=="Peter"];
Waiting opinions |
Topic: D.NET |
antonio
Replies: 23
Views: 83897
|
Forum: Potential Projects Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:22 am Subject: D.NET |
Absolutely NO.
If I use .Net, why not C# directly? Those features are enough in C# and the Frameworks is better.
I Agree.
D needs it's own Framework
Antonio. |
Topic: complex foreach agregators |
antonio
Replies: 10
Views: 23994
|
Forum: General Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:27 pm Subject: complex foreach agregators |
rectification:
foreach(Person person; houses[rooms>2].Owners[age>18 && married])
dosomething(person.name);
foreach(House house in hous ... |
Topic: complex foreach agregators |
antonio
Replies: 10
Views: 23994
|
Forum: General Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:14 pm Subject: complex foreach agregators |
Object relations could be seen as hierarchycal structures like XML documents and could be iterated using XQuery sintax (or similar) that obtains a collection of elements .
I think that foreach coul ... |
Topic: Common path |
antonio
Replies: 1
Views: 14987
|
Forum: Potential Projects Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:46 pm Subject: Common path |
I think D people should concentrate all the efforts in a common path. Actual developments are completly dispersed: each one is solving it's own needs or small dreams... but no one is thinking in a re ... |
Topic: D.NET |
antonio
Replies: 23
Views: 83897
|
Forum: Potential Projects Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:03 am Subject: D.NET |
I hate Virtual Machines!
I like D because it doesn't have Vm.
I prefer to say: I hate Virtual Machines sometimes... .
I think the good way could be to implement a Standard D framework close ... |
Topic: DSP 0.1 - Beta |
antonio
Replies: 5
Views: 27599
|
Forum: DSP Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:34 pm Subject: Re: DSP 0.1 - Beta |
Only one question:
Why a dsp document must be XML compliant?
ex: in PHP you can write somethink like
<html>
<body>
<p<?php echo ">this is "?>a par ... |
|