Note: This website is archived. For up-to-date information about D projects and development, please visit wiki.dlang.org.

Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of PortingJournal

Show
Ignore:
Author:
JJR (IP: 207.200.150.200)
Timestamp:
11/03/08 08:13:26 (15 years ago)
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • PortingJournal

    v12 v13  
    3131 * phase 7: Link to a sample application and work out the remaining logic bugs 
    3232 
    33 In between phases, of course, I would test certain theories to see how the D compiler handled code conversion.  And because D has an interface type, I really hoped I could use that. It would allow me to circumvent some of the workarounds that the Java code required because of it's lack of the same.  I further hoped that the port to D would significantly reduce the Java code complexity. 
     33In between phases, of course, I would test certain theories to see how the D compiler handled code conversion.  And because D has an interface type, I really hoped I could use that. It would allow me to circumvent some of the workarounds that the Java code required because of it's lack of the same (XPCOM compatible interface, that is).  I further hoped that the port to D would significantly reduce the Java code complexity. 
    3434 
    3535'''Phase 1''' was ongoing too. But the initial research was enough to get me going. I found this online book quite useful: [http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/book/cxc/ Creating XPCOM Components]