| 1 |
/**Probability distribution CDFs, PDFs/PMFs, and a few inverse CDFs. |
|---|
| 2 |
* |
|---|
| 3 |
* Authors: David Simcha, Don Clugston*/ |
|---|
| 4 |
/* |
|---|
| 5 |
* Acknowledgements: Some of this module was borrowed the mathstat module |
|---|
| 6 |
* of Don Clugston's MathExtra library. This was done to create a |
|---|
| 7 |
* coherent, complete library without massive dependencies, and without |
|---|
| 8 |
* reinventing the wheel. These functions have been renamed to |
|---|
| 9 |
* fit the naming conventions of this library, and are noted below. |
|---|
| 10 |
* The code from Don Clugston's MathExtra library was based on the Cephes |
|---|
| 11 |
* library by Stephen Moshier. |
|---|
| 12 |
* |
|---|
| 13 |
* Conventions: |
|---|
| 14 |
* Cumulative distribution functions are named <distribution>CDF. For |
|---|
| 15 |
* discrete distributions, are the P(X <= x) where X is the random variable, |
|---|
| 16 |
* NOT P(X < x). |
|---|
| 17 |
* |
|---|
| 18 |
* All CDFs have a complement, named <distribution>CDFR, which stands for |
|---|
| 19 |
* "Cumulative Distribution Function Right". For discrete distributions, |
|---|
| 20 |
* this is P(X >= x), NOT P(X > x) and is therefore NOT equal to |
|---|
| 21 |
* 1 - <distribution>CDF. Also, even for continuous distributions, the |
|---|
| 22 |
* numerical accuracy is higher for small p-values if the CDFR is used than |
|---|
| 23 |
* if 1 - CDF is used. |
|---|
| 24 |
* |
|---|
| 25 |
* If a PDF/PMF function is included for a distribution, it is named |
|---|
| 26 |
* <distribution>PMF or <distribution>PDF (PMF for discrete, PDF for |
|---|
| 27 |
* continuous distributions). |
|---|
| 28 |
* |
|---|
| 29 |
* If an inverse CDF is included, it is named inv<Distribution>CDF. |
|---|
| 30 |
* |
|---|
| 31 |
* For all distributions, the test statistic is the first function parameter |
|---|
| 32 |
* and the distribution parameters are further down the function parameter |
|---|
| 33 |
* list. This is important for certain generic code, such as tests and |
|---|
| 34 |
* the parametrize template. |
|---|
| 35 |
* |
|---|
| 36 |
* The following functions are identical or functionally equivalent to |
|---|
| 37 |
* functions found in MathExtra/Tango.Math.probability. This information |
|---|
| 38 |
* might be useful if someone is trying to integrate this library into other code: |
|---|
| 39 |
* |
|---|
| 40 |
* normalCDF <=> normalDistribution |
|---|
| 41 |
* |
|---|
| 42 |
* normalCDFR <=> normalDistributionCompl |
|---|
| 43 |
* |
|---|
| 44 |
* invNormalCDF <=> normalDistributionComplInv |
|---|
| 45 |
* |
|---|
| 46 |
* studentsTCDF <=> studentsTDistribution (Note reversal in argument order) |
|---|
| 47 |
* |
|---|
| 48 |
* invStudentsTCDF <=> studentsTDistributionInv (Again, arg order reversed) |
|---|
| 49 |
* |
|---|
| 50 |
* binomialCDF <=> binomialDistribution |
|---|
| 51 |
* |
|---|
| 52 |
* negBinomCDF <=> negativeBinomialDistribution |
|---|
| 53 |
* |
|---|
| 54 |
* poissonCDF <=> poissonDistribution |
|---|
| 55 |
* |
|---|
| 56 |
* chiSqrCDF <=> chiSqrDistribution (Note reversed arg order) |
|---|
| 57 |
* |
|---|
| 58 |
* chiSqrCDFR <=> chiSqrDistributionCompl (Note reversed arg order) |
|---|
| 59 |
* |
|---|
| 60 |
* invChiSqCDFR <=> chiSqrDistributionComplInv |
|---|
| 61 |
* |
|---|
| 62 |
* fisherCDF <=> fDistribution (Note reversed arg order) |
|---|
| 63 |
* |
|---|
| 64 |
* fisherCDFR <=> fDistributionCompl (Note reversed arg order) |
|---|
| 65 |
* |
|---|
| 66 |
* invFisherCDFR <=> fDistributionComplInv |
|---|
| 67 |
* |
|---|
| 68 |
* gammaCDF <=> gammaDistribution (Note arg reversal) |
|---|
| 69 |
* |
|---|
| 70 |
* gammaCDFR <=> gammaDistributionCompl (Note arg reversal) |
|---|
| 71 |
* |
|---|
| 72 |
* Note that CDFRs/Compls of continuous distributions are not equivalent, |
|---|
| 73 |
* because in Tango/MathExtra they represent P(X > x) while in dstats they |
|---|
| 74 |
* represent P(X >= x). |
|---|
| 75 |
* |
|---|
| 76 |
* |
|---|
| 77 |
* Copyright (c) 2008-2009, David Simcha and Don Clugston |
|---|
| 78 |
* All rights reserved. |
|---|
| 79 |
* |
|---|
| 80 |
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
|---|
| 81 |
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: |
|---|
| 82 |
* |
|---|
| 83 |
* * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
|---|
| 84 |
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
|---|
| 85 |
* |
|---|
| 86 |
* * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright |
|---|
| 87 |
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the |
|---|
| 88 |
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. |
|---|
| 89 |
* |
|---|
| 90 |
* * Neither the name of the authors nor the |
|---|
| 91 |
* names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products |
|---|
| 92 |
* derived from this software without specific prior written permission. |
|---|
| 93 |
* |
|---|
| 94 |
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ''AS IS'' AND ANY |
|---|
| 95 |
* EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED |
|---|
| 96 |
* WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE |
|---|
| 97 |
* DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY |
|---|
| 98 |
* DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES |
|---|
| 99 |
* (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; |
|---|
| 100 |
* LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND |
|---|
| 101 |
* ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
|---|
| 102 |
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS |
|---|
| 103 |
* SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.*/ |
|---|
| 104 |
|
|---|
| 105 |
module dstats.distrib; |
|---|
| 106 |
|
|---|
| 107 |
import std.algorithm, std.conv, std.exception, std.math, std.traits, |
|---|
| 108 |
std.mathspecial, std.range; |
|---|
| 109 |
|
|---|
| 110 |
alias std.mathspecial.erfc erfc; |
|---|
| 111 |
alias std.mathspecial.erf erf; |
|---|
| 112 |
|
|---|
| 113 |
import dstats.base; |
|---|
| 114 |
|
|---|
| 115 |
// CTFE doesn't work yet for sqrt() in GDC. This value is sqrt(2 * PI). |
|---|
| 116 |
enum SQ2PI = 2.50662827463100050241576528481104525300698674060993831662992; |
|---|
| 117 |
|
|---|
| 118 |
version(unittest) { |
|---|
| 119 |
import std.stdio, std.random; |
|---|
| 120 |
|
|---|
| 121 |
alias std.math.approxEqual ae; |
|---|
| 122 |
|
|---|
| 123 |
void main(){ |
|---|
| 124 |
} |
|---|
| 125 |
} |
|---|
| 126 |
|
|---|
| 127 |
/**Takes a distribution function (CDF or PDF/PMF) as a template argument, and |
|---|
| 128 |
* parameters as function arguments in the order that they appear in the |
|---|
| 129 |
* function declaration and returns a delegate that binds the supplied |
|---|
| 130 |
* parameters to the distribution function. Assumes the non-parameter |
|---|
| 131 |
* argument is the first argument to the distribution function. |
|---|
| 132 |
* |
|---|
| 133 |
* Examples: |
|---|
| 134 |
* --- |
|---|
| 135 |
* auto stdNormal = parametrize!(normalCDF)(0.0L, 1.0L); |
|---|
| 136 |
* --- |
|---|
| 137 |
* |
|---|
| 138 |
* stdNormal is now a delegate for the normal(0, 1) distribution.*/ |
|---|
| 139 |
double delegate(ParameterTypeTuple!(distrib)[0]) |
|---|
| 140 |
parametrize(alias distrib)(ParameterTypeTuple!(distrib)[1..$] |
|---|
| 141 |
parameters) { |
|---|
| 142 |
|
|---|
| 143 |
double calculate(ParameterTypeTuple!(distrib)[0] arg) { |
|---|
| 144 |
return distrib(arg, parameters); |
|---|
| 145 |
} |
|---|
| 146 |
|
|---|
| 147 |
return &calculate; |
|---|
| 148 |
} |
|---|
| 149 |
|
|---|
| 150 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 151 |
// Just basically see if this compiles. |
|---|
| 152 |
auto stdNormal = parametrize!normalCDF(0, 1); |
|---|
| 153 |
assert(approxEqual(stdNormal(2.5), normalCDF(2.5, 0, 1))); |
|---|
| 154 |
} |
|---|
| 155 |
|
|---|
| 156 |
/// |
|---|
| 157 |
struct ParamFunctor(alias distrib) { |
|---|
| 158 |
ParameterTypeTuple!(distrib)[1..$] parameters; |
|---|
| 159 |
|
|---|
| 160 |
double opCall(ParameterTypeTuple!(distrib)[0] arg) { |
|---|
| 161 |
return distrib(arg, parameters); |
|---|
| 162 |
} |
|---|
| 163 |
} |
|---|
| 164 |
|
|---|
| 165 |
/**Takes a distribution function (CDF or PDF/PMF) as a template argument, and |
|---|
| 166 |
* parameters as function arguments in the order that they appear in the |
|---|
| 167 |
* function declaration and returns a functor that binds the supplied |
|---|
| 168 |
* parameters to the distribution function. Assumes the non-parameter |
|---|
| 169 |
* argument is the first argument to the distribution function. |
|---|
| 170 |
* |
|---|
| 171 |
* Examples: |
|---|
| 172 |
* --- |
|---|
| 173 |
* auto stdNormal = paramFunctor!(normalCDF)(0.0L, 1.0L); |
|---|
| 174 |
* --- |
|---|
| 175 |
* |
|---|
| 176 |
* stdNormal is now a functor for the normal(0, 1) distribution.*/ |
|---|
| 177 |
ParamFunctor!(distrib) paramFunctor(alias distrib) |
|---|
| 178 |
(ParameterTypeTuple!(distrib)[1..$] parameters) { |
|---|
| 179 |
ParamFunctor!(distrib) ret; |
|---|
| 180 |
foreach(ti, elem; parameters) { |
|---|
| 181 |
ret.tupleof[ti] = elem; |
|---|
| 182 |
} |
|---|
| 183 |
return ret; |
|---|
| 184 |
} |
|---|
| 185 |
|
|---|
| 186 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 187 |
// Just basically see if this compiles. |
|---|
| 188 |
auto stdNormal = paramFunctor!normalCDF(0, 1); |
|---|
| 189 |
assert(approxEqual(stdNormal(2.5), normalCDF(2.5, 0, 1))); |
|---|
| 190 |
} |
|---|
| 191 |
|
|---|
| 192 |
/// |
|---|
| 193 |
double uniformPDF(double X, double lower, double upper) { |
|---|
| 194 |
dstatsEnforce(X >= lower, "Can't have X < lower bound in uniform distribution."); |
|---|
| 195 |
dstatsEnforce(X <= upper, "Can't have X > upper bound in uniform distribution."); |
|---|
| 196 |
return 1.0L / (upper - lower); |
|---|
| 197 |
} |
|---|
| 198 |
|
|---|
| 199 |
/// |
|---|
| 200 |
double uniformCDF(double X, double lower, double upper) { |
|---|
| 201 |
dstatsEnforce(X >= lower, "Can't have X < lower bound in uniform distribution."); |
|---|
| 202 |
dstatsEnforce(X <= upper, "Can't have X > upper bound in uniform distribution."); |
|---|
| 203 |
|
|---|
| 204 |
return (X - lower) / (upper - lower); |
|---|
| 205 |
} |
|---|
| 206 |
|
|---|
| 207 |
/// |
|---|
| 208 |
double uniformCDFR(double X, double lower, double upper) { |
|---|
| 209 |
dstatsEnforce(X >= lower, "Can't have X < lower bound in uniform distribution."); |
|---|
| 210 |
dstatsEnforce(X <= upper, "Can't have X > upper bound in uniform distribution."); |
|---|
| 211 |
|
|---|
| 212 |
return (upper - X) / (upper - lower); |
|---|
| 213 |
} |
|---|
| 214 |
|
|---|
| 215 |
/// |
|---|
| 216 |
double poissonPMF(ulong k, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 217 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "Cannot have a Poisson with lambda <= 0 or nan."); |
|---|
| 218 |
|
|---|
| 219 |
return exp(cast(double) k * log(lambda) - |
|---|
| 220 |
(lambda + logFactorial(k))); //Grouped for best precision. |
|---|
| 221 |
} |
|---|
| 222 |
|
|---|
| 223 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 224 |
assert(approxEqual(poissonPMF(1, .1), .0904837)); |
|---|
| 225 |
} |
|---|
| 226 |
|
|---|
| 227 |
enum POISSON_NORMAL = 1UL << 12; // Where to switch to normal approx. |
|---|
| 228 |
|
|---|
| 229 |
// The gamma incomplete function is too unstable and the distribution |
|---|
| 230 |
// is for all practical purposes normal anyhow. |
|---|
| 231 |
private double normApproxPoisCDF(ulong k, double lambda) |
|---|
| 232 |
in { |
|---|
| 233 |
assert(lambda > 0); |
|---|
| 234 |
} body { |
|---|
| 235 |
double sd = sqrt(lambda); |
|---|
| 236 |
// mean == lambda. |
|---|
| 237 |
return normalCDF(k + 0.5L, lambda, sd); |
|---|
| 238 |
} |
|---|
| 239 |
|
|---|
| 240 |
/**P(K <= k) where K is r.v.*/ |
|---|
| 241 |
double poissonCDF(ulong k, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 242 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "Cannot have a poisson with lambda <= 0 or nan."); |
|---|
| 243 |
|
|---|
| 244 |
return (max(k, lambda) >= POISSON_NORMAL) ? |
|---|
| 245 |
normApproxPoisCDF(k, lambda) : |
|---|
| 246 |
gammaIncompleteCompl(k + 1, lambda); |
|---|
| 247 |
} |
|---|
| 248 |
|
|---|
| 249 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 250 |
// Make sure this jives with adding up PMF elements, since this is a |
|---|
| 251 |
// discrete distribution. |
|---|
| 252 |
static double pmfSum(uint k, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 253 |
double ret = 0; |
|---|
| 254 |
foreach(i; 0..k + 1) { |
|---|
| 255 |
ret += poissonPMF(i, lambda); |
|---|
| 256 |
} |
|---|
| 257 |
return ret; |
|---|
| 258 |
} |
|---|
| 259 |
|
|---|
| 260 |
assert(approxEqual(poissonCDF(1, 0.5), pmfSum(1, 0.5))); |
|---|
| 261 |
assert(approxEqual(poissonCDF(3, 0.7), pmfSum(3, 0.7))); |
|---|
| 262 |
|
|---|
| 263 |
// Absurdly huge values: Test normal approximation. |
|---|
| 264 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 265 |
double ans = poissonCDF( (1UL << 50) - 10_000_000, 1UL << 50); |
|---|
| 266 |
assert(approxEqual(ans, 0.3828427)); |
|---|
| 267 |
|
|---|
| 268 |
// Make sure cutoff is reasonable, i.e. make sure gamma incomplete branch |
|---|
| 269 |
// and normal branch get roughly the same answer near the cutoff. |
|---|
| 270 |
for(double lambda = POISSON_NORMAL / 2; lambda <= POISSON_NORMAL * 2; lambda += 100) { |
|---|
| 271 |
for(ulong k = POISSON_NORMAL / 2; k <= POISSON_NORMAL * 2; k += 100) { |
|---|
| 272 |
double normAns = normApproxPoisCDF(k, lambda); |
|---|
| 273 |
double gammaAns = gammaIncompleteCompl(k + 1, lambda); |
|---|
| 274 |
assert(abs(normAns - gammaAns) < 0.01, text(normAns, '\t', gammaAns)); |
|---|
| 275 |
} |
|---|
| 276 |
} |
|---|
| 277 |
} |
|---|
| 278 |
|
|---|
| 279 |
// The gamma incomplete function is too unstable and the distribution |
|---|
| 280 |
// is for all practical purposes normal anyhow. |
|---|
| 281 |
private double normApproxPoisCDFR(ulong k, double lambda) |
|---|
| 282 |
in { |
|---|
| 283 |
assert(lambda > 0); |
|---|
| 284 |
} body { |
|---|
| 285 |
double sd = sqrt(lambda); |
|---|
| 286 |
// mean == lambda. |
|---|
| 287 |
return normalCDFR(k - 0.5L, lambda, sd); |
|---|
| 288 |
} |
|---|
| 289 |
|
|---|
| 290 |
/**P(K >= k) where K is r.v.*/ |
|---|
| 291 |
double poissonCDFR(ulong k, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 292 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "Can't have a poisson with lambda <= 0 or nan."); |
|---|
| 293 |
|
|---|
| 294 |
return (max(k, lambda) >= POISSON_NORMAL) ? |
|---|
| 295 |
normApproxPoisCDFR(k, lambda) : |
|---|
| 296 |
gammaIncomplete(k, lambda); |
|---|
| 297 |
} |
|---|
| 298 |
|
|---|
| 299 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 300 |
// Make sure this jives with adding up PMF elements, since this is a |
|---|
| 301 |
// discrete distribution. |
|---|
| 302 |
static double pmfSum(uint k, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 303 |
double ret = 0; |
|---|
| 304 |
foreach(i; 0..k + 1) { |
|---|
| 305 |
ret += poissonPMF(i, lambda); |
|---|
| 306 |
} |
|---|
| 307 |
return ret; |
|---|
| 308 |
} |
|---|
| 309 |
|
|---|
| 310 |
assert(approxEqual(poissonCDFR(1, 0.5), 1 - pmfSum(0, 0.5))); |
|---|
| 311 |
assert(approxEqual(poissonCDFR(3, 0.7), 1 - pmfSum(2, 0.7))); |
|---|
| 312 |
|
|---|
| 313 |
// Absurdly huge value to test normal approximation. |
|---|
| 314 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 315 |
double ans = poissonCDFR( (1UL << 50) - 10_000_000, 1UL << 50); |
|---|
| 316 |
assert(approxEqual(ans, 0.6171573)); |
|---|
| 317 |
|
|---|
| 318 |
// Make sure cutoff is reasonable, i.e. make sure gamma incomplete branch |
|---|
| 319 |
// and normal branch get roughly the same answer near the cutoff. |
|---|
| 320 |
for(double lambda = POISSON_NORMAL / 2; lambda <= POISSON_NORMAL * 2; lambda += 100) { |
|---|
| 321 |
for(ulong k = POISSON_NORMAL / 2; k <= POISSON_NORMAL * 2; k += 100) { |
|---|
| 322 |
double normAns = normApproxPoisCDFR(k, lambda); |
|---|
| 323 |
double gammaAns = gammaIncomplete(k, lambda); |
|---|
| 324 |
assert(abs(normAns - gammaAns) < 0.01, text(normAns, '\t', gammaAns)); |
|---|
| 325 |
} |
|---|
| 326 |
} |
|---|
| 327 |
} |
|---|
| 328 |
|
|---|
| 329 |
/**Returns the value of k for the given p-value and lambda. If p-val |
|---|
| 330 |
* doesn't exactly map to a value of k, the k for which poissonCDF(k, lambda) |
|---|
| 331 |
* is closest to pVal is used.*/ |
|---|
| 332 |
uint invPoissonCDF(double pVal, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 333 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "Cannot have a poisson with lambda <= 0 or nan."); |
|---|
| 334 |
dstatsEnforce(pVal >= 0 && pVal <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 335 |
|
|---|
| 336 |
// Use normal approximation to get approx answer, then brute force search. |
|---|
| 337 |
// This works better than you think because for small n, there's not much |
|---|
| 338 |
// search space and for large n, the normal approx. is doublely good. |
|---|
| 339 |
uint guess = cast(uint) max(round( |
|---|
| 340 |
invNormalCDF(pVal, lambda, sqrt(lambda)) + 0.5), 0.0L); |
|---|
| 341 |
double guessP = poissonCDF(guess, lambda); |
|---|
| 342 |
|
|---|
| 343 |
if(guessP == pVal) { |
|---|
| 344 |
return guess; |
|---|
| 345 |
} else if(guessP < pVal) { |
|---|
| 346 |
for(uint k = guess + 1; ; k++) { |
|---|
| 347 |
double newP = guessP + poissonPMF(k, lambda); |
|---|
| 348 |
if(newP >= 1) |
|---|
| 349 |
return k; |
|---|
| 350 |
if(abs(newP - pVal) > abs(guessP - pVal)) { |
|---|
| 351 |
return k - 1; |
|---|
| 352 |
} else { |
|---|
| 353 |
guessP = newP; |
|---|
| 354 |
} |
|---|
| 355 |
} |
|---|
| 356 |
} else { |
|---|
| 357 |
for(uint k = guess - 1; k != uint.max; k--) { |
|---|
| 358 |
double newP = guessP - poissonPMF(k + 1, lambda); |
|---|
| 359 |
if(abs(newP - pVal) > abs(guessP - pVal)) { |
|---|
| 360 |
return k + 1; |
|---|
| 361 |
} else { |
|---|
| 362 |
guessP = newP; |
|---|
| 363 |
} |
|---|
| 364 |
} |
|---|
| 365 |
return 0; |
|---|
| 366 |
} |
|---|
| 367 |
} |
|---|
| 368 |
|
|---|
| 369 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 370 |
foreach(i; 0..1_000) { |
|---|
| 371 |
// Restricted variable ranges are because, in the tails, more than one |
|---|
| 372 |
// value of k can map to the same p-value at machine precision. |
|---|
| 373 |
// Obviously, this is one of those corner cases that nothing can be |
|---|
| 374 |
// done about. |
|---|
| 375 |
double lambda = uniform(.05L, 8.0L); |
|---|
| 376 |
uint k = uniform(0U, cast(uint) ceil(3.0L * lambda)); |
|---|
| 377 |
double pVal = poissonCDF(k, lambda); |
|---|
| 378 |
assert(invPoissonCDF(pVal, lambda) == k); |
|---|
| 379 |
} |
|---|
| 380 |
} |
|---|
| 381 |
|
|---|
| 382 |
/// |
|---|
| 383 |
double binomialPMF(ulong k, ulong n, double p) { |
|---|
| 384 |
dstatsEnforce(k <= n, "k cannot be > n in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 385 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 386 |
return exp(logNcomb(n, k) + k * log(p) + (n - k) * log(1 - p)); |
|---|
| 387 |
} |
|---|
| 388 |
|
|---|
| 389 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 390 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialPMF(0, 10, .5), cast(double) 1/1024)); |
|---|
| 391 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialPMF(100, 1000, .11), .024856)); |
|---|
| 392 |
} |
|---|
| 393 |
|
|---|
| 394 |
// Determines what value of n we switch to normal approximation at b/c |
|---|
| 395 |
// betaIncomplete becomes unstable. |
|---|
| 396 |
private enum BINOM_APPROX = 1UL << 24; |
|---|
| 397 |
|
|---|
| 398 |
// Cutoff value of n * p for deciding whether to go w/ normal or poisson approx |
|---|
| 399 |
// when betaIncomplete becomes unstable. |
|---|
| 400 |
private enum BINOM_POISSON = 1_024; |
|---|
| 401 |
|
|---|
| 402 |
// betaIncomplete is numerically unstable for huge values of n. |
|---|
| 403 |
// Luckily this is exactly when the normal approximation becomes |
|---|
| 404 |
// for all practical purposes exact. |
|---|
| 405 |
private double normApproxBinomCDF(double k, double n, double p) |
|---|
| 406 |
in { |
|---|
| 407 |
assert(k <= n); |
|---|
| 408 |
assert(p >= 0 && p <= 1); |
|---|
| 409 |
} body { |
|---|
| 410 |
double mu = p * n; |
|---|
| 411 |
double sd = sqrt( to!double(n) ) * sqrt(p) * sqrt(1 - p); |
|---|
| 412 |
double xCC = k + 0.5L; |
|---|
| 413 |
return normalCDF(xCC, mu, sd); |
|---|
| 414 |
} |
|---|
| 415 |
|
|---|
| 416 |
///P(K <= k) where K is random variable. |
|---|
| 417 |
double binomialCDF(ulong k, ulong n, double p) { |
|---|
| 418 |
dstatsEnforce(k <= n, "k cannot be > n in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 419 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 420 |
|
|---|
| 421 |
if(k == n) { |
|---|
| 422 |
return 1; |
|---|
| 423 |
} else if(k == 0) { |
|---|
| 424 |
return pow(1.0 - p, cast(double) n); |
|---|
| 425 |
} |
|---|
| 426 |
|
|---|
| 427 |
if(n > BINOM_APPROX) { |
|---|
| 428 |
if(n * p < BINOM_POISSON) { |
|---|
| 429 |
return poissonCDF(k, n * p); |
|---|
| 430 |
} else if(n * (1 - p) < BINOM_POISSON) { |
|---|
| 431 |
return poissonCDFR(n - k, n * (1 - p)); |
|---|
| 432 |
} else { |
|---|
| 433 |
return normApproxBinomCDF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 434 |
} |
|---|
| 435 |
} |
|---|
| 436 |
|
|---|
| 437 |
return betaIncomplete(n - k, k + 1, 1.0 - p); |
|---|
| 438 |
} |
|---|
| 439 |
|
|---|
| 440 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 441 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(10, 100, .11), 0.4528744401)); |
|---|
| 442 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(15, 100, .12), 0.8585510507)); |
|---|
| 443 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(50, 1000, .04), 0.95093595)); |
|---|
| 444 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(7600, 15000, .5), .9496193045414)); |
|---|
| 445 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(0, 10, 0.2), 0.1073742)); |
|---|
| 446 |
|
|---|
| 447 |
// Absurdly huge numbers: |
|---|
| 448 |
{ |
|---|
| 449 |
ulong k = (1UL << 60) - 100_000_000; |
|---|
| 450 |
ulong n = 1UL << 61; |
|---|
| 451 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(k, n, 0.5L), 0.4476073)); |
|---|
| 452 |
} |
|---|
| 453 |
|
|---|
| 454 |
// Test Poisson branch. |
|---|
| 455 |
double poisAns = binomialCDF(85, 1UL << 26, 1.49e-6); |
|---|
| 456 |
assert(approxEqual(poisAns, 0.07085327)); |
|---|
| 457 |
|
|---|
| 458 |
// Test poissonCDFR branch. |
|---|
| 459 |
poisAns = binomialCDF( (1UL << 25) - 100, 1UL << 25, 0.9999975L); |
|---|
| 460 |
assert(approxEqual(poisAns, 0.04713316)); |
|---|
| 461 |
|
|---|
| 462 |
// Make sure cutoff is reasonable: Just below it, we should get similar |
|---|
| 463 |
// results for normal, exact. |
|---|
| 464 |
for(ulong n = BINOM_APPROX / 2; n < BINOM_APPROX; n += 200_000) { |
|---|
| 465 |
for(double p = 0.01; p <= 0.99; p += 0.05) { |
|---|
| 466 |
|
|---|
| 467 |
long lowerK = roundTo!long( n * p * 0.99); |
|---|
| 468 |
long upperK = roundTo!long( n * p / 0.99); |
|---|
| 469 |
|
|---|
| 470 |
for(ulong k = lowerK; k <= min(n, upperK); k += 1_000) { |
|---|
| 471 |
double normRes = normApproxBinomCDF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 472 |
double exactRes = binomialCDF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 473 |
assert(abs(normRes - exactRes) < 0.001, |
|---|
| 474 |
text(normRes, '\t', exactRes)); |
|---|
| 475 |
} |
|---|
| 476 |
} |
|---|
| 477 |
} |
|---|
| 478 |
|
|---|
| 479 |
} |
|---|
| 480 |
|
|---|
| 481 |
// betaIncomplete is numerically unstable for huge values of n. |
|---|
| 482 |
// Luckily this is exactly when the normal approximation becomes |
|---|
| 483 |
// for all practical purposes exact. |
|---|
| 484 |
private double normApproxBinomCDFR(ulong k, ulong n, double p) |
|---|
| 485 |
in { |
|---|
| 486 |
assert(k <= n); |
|---|
| 487 |
assert(p >= 0 && p <= 1); |
|---|
| 488 |
} body { |
|---|
| 489 |
double mu = p * n; |
|---|
| 490 |
double sd = sqrt( to!double(n) ) * sqrt(p) * sqrt(1 - p); |
|---|
| 491 |
double xCC = k - 0.5L; |
|---|
| 492 |
return normalCDFR(xCC, mu, sd); |
|---|
| 493 |
} |
|---|
| 494 |
|
|---|
| 495 |
///P(K >= k) where K is random variable. |
|---|
| 496 |
double binomialCDFR(ulong k, ulong n, double p) { |
|---|
| 497 |
dstatsEnforce(k <= n, "k cannot be > n in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 498 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 499 |
|
|---|
| 500 |
if(k == 0) { |
|---|
| 501 |
return 1; |
|---|
| 502 |
} else if(k == n) { |
|---|
| 503 |
return pow(p, cast(double) n); |
|---|
| 504 |
} |
|---|
| 505 |
|
|---|
| 506 |
if(n > BINOM_APPROX) { |
|---|
| 507 |
if(n * p < BINOM_POISSON) { |
|---|
| 508 |
return poissonCDFR(k, n * p); |
|---|
| 509 |
} else if(n * (1 - p) < BINOM_POISSON) { |
|---|
| 510 |
return poissonCDF(n - k, n * (1 - p)); |
|---|
| 511 |
} else { |
|---|
| 512 |
return normApproxBinomCDFR(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 513 |
} |
|---|
| 514 |
} |
|---|
| 515 |
|
|---|
| 516 |
return betaIncomplete(k, n - k + 1, p); |
|---|
| 517 |
} |
|---|
| 518 |
|
|---|
| 519 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 520 |
// Values from R, Maxima. |
|---|
| 521 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(10, 100, .11), 1 - |
|---|
| 522 |
binomialCDFR(11, 100, .11))); |
|---|
| 523 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(15, 100, .12), 1 - |
|---|
| 524 |
binomialCDFR(16, 100, .12))); |
|---|
| 525 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(50, 1000, .04), 1 - |
|---|
| 526 |
binomialCDFR(51, 1000, .04))); |
|---|
| 527 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(7600, 15000, .5), 1 - |
|---|
| 528 |
binomialCDFR(7601, 15000, .5))); |
|---|
| 529 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDF(9, 10, 0.3), 1 - |
|---|
| 530 |
binomialCDFR(10, 10, 0.3))); |
|---|
| 531 |
|
|---|
| 532 |
// Absurdly huge numbers, test normal branch. |
|---|
| 533 |
{ |
|---|
| 534 |
ulong k = (1UL << 60) - 100_000_000; |
|---|
| 535 |
ulong n = 1UL << 61; |
|---|
| 536 |
assert(approxEqual(binomialCDFR(k, n, 0.5L), 0.5523927)); |
|---|
| 537 |
} |
|---|
| 538 |
|
|---|
| 539 |
// Test Poisson inversion branch. |
|---|
| 540 |
double poisRes = binomialCDFR((1UL << 25) - 70, 1UL << 25, 0.9999975L); |
|---|
| 541 |
assert(approxEqual(poisRes, 0.06883905)); |
|---|
| 542 |
|
|---|
| 543 |
// Test Poisson branch. |
|---|
| 544 |
poisRes = binomialCDFR(350, 1UL << 25, 1e-5); |
|---|
| 545 |
assert(approxEqual(poisRes, 0.2219235)); |
|---|
| 546 |
|
|---|
| 547 |
// Make sure cutoff is reasonable: Just below it, we should get similar |
|---|
| 548 |
// results for normal, exact. |
|---|
| 549 |
for(ulong n = BINOM_APPROX / 2; n < BINOM_APPROX; n += 200_000) { |
|---|
| 550 |
for(double p = 0.01; p <= 0.99; p += 0.05) { |
|---|
| 551 |
|
|---|
| 552 |
long lowerK = roundTo!long( n * p * 0.99); |
|---|
| 553 |
long upperK = roundTo!long( n * p / 0.99); |
|---|
| 554 |
|
|---|
| 555 |
for(ulong k = lowerK; k <= min(n, upperK); k += 1_000) { |
|---|
| 556 |
double normRes = normApproxBinomCDFR(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 557 |
double exactRes = binomialCDFR(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 558 |
assert(abs(normRes - exactRes) < 0.001, |
|---|
| 559 |
text(normRes, '\t', exactRes)); |
|---|
| 560 |
} |
|---|
| 561 |
} |
|---|
| 562 |
} |
|---|
| 563 |
} |
|---|
| 564 |
|
|---|
| 565 |
/**Returns the value of k for the given p-value, n and p. If p-value does |
|---|
| 566 |
* not exactly map to a value of k, the value for which binomialCDF(k, n, p) |
|---|
| 567 |
* is closest to pVal is used.*/ |
|---|
| 568 |
uint invBinomialCDF(double pVal, uint n, double p) { |
|---|
| 569 |
dstatsEnforce(pVal >= 0 && pVal <= 1, "p-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 570 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 in binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 571 |
|
|---|
| 572 |
// Use normal approximation to get approx answer, then brute force search. |
|---|
| 573 |
// This works better than you think because for small n, there's not much |
|---|
| 574 |
// search space and for large n, the normal approx. is doublely good. |
|---|
| 575 |
uint guess = cast(uint) max(round( |
|---|
| 576 |
invNormalCDF(pVal, n * p, sqrt(n * p * (1 - p)))) + 0.5, 0); |
|---|
| 577 |
if(guess > n) { |
|---|
| 578 |
if(pVal < 0.5) // Numerical issues/overflow. |
|---|
| 579 |
guess = 0; |
|---|
| 580 |
else guess = n; |
|---|
| 581 |
} |
|---|
| 582 |
double guessP = binomialCDF(guess, n, p); |
|---|
| 583 |
|
|---|
| 584 |
if(guessP == pVal) { |
|---|
| 585 |
return guess; |
|---|
| 586 |
} else if(guessP < pVal) { |
|---|
| 587 |
for(uint k = guess + 1; k <= n; k++) { |
|---|
| 588 |
double newP = guessP + binomialPMF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 589 |
if(abs(newP - pVal) > abs(guessP - pVal)) { |
|---|
| 590 |
return k - 1; |
|---|
| 591 |
} else { |
|---|
| 592 |
guessP = newP; |
|---|
| 593 |
} |
|---|
| 594 |
} |
|---|
| 595 |
return n; |
|---|
| 596 |
} else { |
|---|
| 597 |
for(uint k = guess - 1; k != uint.max; k--) { |
|---|
| 598 |
double newP = guessP - binomialPMF(k + 1, n, p); |
|---|
| 599 |
if(abs(newP - pVal) > abs(guessP - pVal)) { |
|---|
| 600 |
return k + 1; |
|---|
| 601 |
} else { |
|---|
| 602 |
guessP = newP; |
|---|
| 603 |
} |
|---|
| 604 |
} |
|---|
| 605 |
return 0; |
|---|
| 606 |
} |
|---|
| 607 |
} |
|---|
| 608 |
|
|---|
| 609 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 610 |
Random gen = Random(unpredictableSeed); |
|---|
| 611 |
foreach(i; 0..1_000) { |
|---|
| 612 |
// Restricted variable ranges are because, in the tails, more than one |
|---|
| 613 |
// value of k can map to the same p-value at machine precision. |
|---|
| 614 |
// Obviously, this is one of those corner cases that nothing can be |
|---|
| 615 |
// done about. Using small n's, moderate p's prevents this. |
|---|
| 616 |
uint n = uniform(5U, 10U); |
|---|
| 617 |
uint k = uniform(0U, n); |
|---|
| 618 |
double p = uniform(0.1L, 0.9L); |
|---|
| 619 |
double pVal = binomialCDF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 620 |
assert(invBinomialCDF(pVal, n, p) == k); |
|---|
| 621 |
} |
|---|
| 622 |
} |
|---|
| 623 |
|
|---|
| 624 |
/// |
|---|
| 625 |
double hypergeometricPMF(long x, long n1, long n2, long n) |
|---|
| 626 |
in { |
|---|
| 627 |
assert(x <= n); |
|---|
| 628 |
} body { |
|---|
| 629 |
if(x > n1 || x < (n - n2)) { |
|---|
| 630 |
return 0; |
|---|
| 631 |
} |
|---|
| 632 |
double result = logNcomb(n1, x) + logNcomb(n2, n - x) - logNcomb(n1 + n2, n); |
|---|
| 633 |
return exp(result); |
|---|
| 634 |
} |
|---|
| 635 |
|
|---|
| 636 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 637 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricPMF(5, 10, 10, 10), .3437182)); |
|---|
| 638 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricPMF(9, 12, 10, 15), .27089783)); |
|---|
| 639 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricPMF(9, 100, 100, 15), .15500003)); |
|---|
| 640 |
} |
|---|
| 641 |
|
|---|
| 642 |
/**P(X <= x), where X is random variable. Uses either direct summation, |
|---|
| 643 |
* normal or binomial approximation depending on parameters.*/ |
|---|
| 644 |
// If anyone knows a better algorithm for this, feel free... |
|---|
| 645 |
// I've read a decent amount about it, though, and getting hypergeometric |
|---|
| 646 |
// CDFs that are both accurate and fast is just plain hard. This |
|---|
| 647 |
// implementation attempts to strike a balance between the two, so that |
|---|
| 648 |
// both speed and accuracy are "good enough" for most practical purposes. |
|---|
| 649 |
double hypergeometricCDF(long x, long n1, long n2, long n) { |
|---|
| 650 |
dstatsEnforce(x <= n, "x must be <= n in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 651 |
dstatsEnforce(n <= n1 + n2, "n must be <= n1 + n2 in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 652 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >= 0 in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 653 |
|
|---|
| 654 |
ulong expec = (n1 * n) / (n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 655 |
long nComp = n1 + n2 - n, xComp = n2 + x - n; |
|---|
| 656 |
|
|---|
| 657 |
// Try to reduce number of calculations using identities. |
|---|
| 658 |
if(x >= n1 || x == n) { |
|---|
| 659 |
return 1; |
|---|
| 660 |
} else if(x > expec && x > n / 2) { |
|---|
| 661 |
return 1 - hypergeometricCDF(n - x - 1, n2, n1, n); |
|---|
| 662 |
} else if(xComp < x && xComp > 0) { |
|---|
| 663 |
return hypergeometricCDF(xComp, n2, n1, nComp); |
|---|
| 664 |
} |
|---|
| 665 |
|
|---|
| 666 |
// Speed depends on x mostly, so always use exact for small x. |
|---|
| 667 |
if(x <= 100) { |
|---|
| 668 |
return hyperExact(x, n1, n2, n); |
|---|
| 669 |
} |
|---|
| 670 |
|
|---|
| 671 |
// Determine whether to use exact, normal approx or binomial approx. |
|---|
| 672 |
// Using obviously arbitrary but relatively stringent standards |
|---|
| 673 |
// for determining whether to approximate. |
|---|
| 674 |
enum NEXACT = 50L; |
|---|
| 675 |
|
|---|
| 676 |
double p = cast(double) n1 / (n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 677 |
double pComp = cast(double) n2 / (n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 678 |
double pMin = min(p, pComp); |
|---|
| 679 |
if(min(n, nComp) * pMin >= 100) { |
|---|
| 680 |
// Since high relative error in the lower tail is a significant problem, |
|---|
| 681 |
// this is a hack to improve the normal approximation: Use the normal |
|---|
| 682 |
// approximation, except calculate the last NEXACT elements exactly, |
|---|
| 683 |
// since elements around the e.v. are where absolute error is highest. |
|---|
| 684 |
// For large x, gives most of the accuracy of an exact calculation in |
|---|
| 685 |
// only a small fraction of the time. |
|---|
| 686 |
if(x <= expec + NEXACT / 2) { |
|---|
| 687 |
return min(1, normApproxHyper(x - NEXACT, n1, n2, n) + |
|---|
| 688 |
hyperExact(x, n1, n2, n, x - NEXACT + 1)); |
|---|
| 689 |
} else { |
|---|
| 690 |
// Just use plain old normal approx. Since P is large, the |
|---|
| 691 |
// relative error won't be so bad anyhow. |
|---|
| 692 |
return normApproxHyper(x, n1, n2, n); |
|---|
| 693 |
} |
|---|
| 694 |
} |
|---|
| 695 |
// Try to make n as small as possible by applying mathematically equivalent |
|---|
| 696 |
// transformations so that binomial approx. works as well as possible. |
|---|
| 697 |
ulong bSc1 = (n1 + n2) / n, bSc2 = (n1 + n2) / n1; |
|---|
| 698 |
|
|---|
| 699 |
if(bSc1 >= 50 && bSc1 > bSc2) { |
|---|
| 700 |
// Same hack as normal approximation for rel. acc. in lower tail. |
|---|
| 701 |
if(x <= expec + NEXACT / 2) { |
|---|
| 702 |
return min(1, binomialCDF(cast(uint) (x - NEXACT), cast(uint) n, p) + |
|---|
| 703 |
hyperExact(x, n1, n2, n, x - NEXACT + 1)); |
|---|
| 704 |
} else { |
|---|
| 705 |
return binomialCDF(cast(uint) x, cast(uint) n, p); |
|---|
| 706 |
} |
|---|
| 707 |
} else if(bSc2 >= 50 && bSc2 > bSc1) { |
|---|
| 708 |
double p2 = cast(double) n / (n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 709 |
if(x <= expec + NEXACT / 2) { |
|---|
| 710 |
return min(1, binomialCDF(cast(uint) (x - NEXACT), cast(uint) n1, p2) + |
|---|
| 711 |
hyperExact(x, n1, n2, n, x - NEXACT + 1)); |
|---|
| 712 |
} else { |
|---|
| 713 |
return binomialCDF(cast(uint) x, cast(uint) n1, p2); |
|---|
| 714 |
} |
|---|
| 715 |
} else { |
|---|
| 716 |
return hyperExact(x, n1, n2, n); |
|---|
| 717 |
} |
|---|
| 718 |
} |
|---|
| 719 |
|
|---|
| 720 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 721 |
// Values from R and the Maxima CAS. |
|---|
| 722 |
// Test exact branch, including reversing, complementing. |
|---|
| 723 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(5, 10, 10, 10), 0.6718591)); |
|---|
| 724 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(3, 11, 15, 10), 0.27745322)); |
|---|
| 725 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(18, 27, 31, 35), 0.88271714)); |
|---|
| 726 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(21, 29, 31, 35), 0.99229253)); |
|---|
| 727 |
|
|---|
| 728 |
// Normal branch. |
|---|
| 729 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(501, 2000, 1000, 800), 0.002767073)); |
|---|
| 730 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(565, 2000, 1000, 800), 0.9977068)); |
|---|
| 731 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(2700, 10000, 20000, 8000), 0.825652)); |
|---|
| 732 |
|
|---|
| 733 |
// Binomial branch. One for each transformation. |
|---|
| 734 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(110, 5000, 7000, 239), 0.9255627)); |
|---|
| 735 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(19840, 2950998, 12624, 19933), 0.2020618)); |
|---|
| 736 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(130, 24195, 52354, 295), 0.9999973)); |
|---|
| 737 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(103, 901, 49014, 3522), 0.999999)); |
|---|
| 738 |
} |
|---|
| 739 |
|
|---|
| 740 |
///P(X >= x), where X is random variable. |
|---|
| 741 |
double hypergeometricCDFR(ulong x, ulong n1, ulong n2, ulong n) { |
|---|
| 742 |
dstatsEnforce(x <= n, "x must be <= n in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 743 |
dstatsEnforce(n <= n1 + n2, "n must be <= n1 + n2 in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 744 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >= 0 in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 745 |
|
|---|
| 746 |
return hypergeometricCDF(n - x, n2, n1, n); |
|---|
| 747 |
} |
|---|
| 748 |
|
|---|
| 749 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 750 |
//Reverses n1, n2 and subtracts x from n to get mirror image. |
|---|
| 751 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(5,10,10,10), |
|---|
| 752 |
hypergeometricCDFR(5,10,10,10))); |
|---|
| 753 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(3, 11, 15, 10), |
|---|
| 754 |
hypergeometricCDFR(7, 15, 11, 10))); |
|---|
| 755 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(18, 27, 31, 35), |
|---|
| 756 |
hypergeometricCDFR(17, 31, 27, 35))); |
|---|
| 757 |
assert(approxEqual(hypergeometricCDF(21, 29, 31, 35), |
|---|
| 758 |
hypergeometricCDFR(14, 31, 29, 35))); |
|---|
| 759 |
} |
|---|
| 760 |
|
|---|
| 761 |
double hyperExact(ulong x, ulong n1, ulong n2, ulong n, ulong startAt = 0) { |
|---|
| 762 |
dstatsEnforce(x <= n, "x must be <= n in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 763 |
dstatsEnforce(n <= n1 + n2, "n must be <= n1 + n2 in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 764 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >= 0 in hypergeometric distribution."); |
|---|
| 765 |
|
|---|
| 766 |
immutable double constPart = logFactorial(n1) + logFactorial(n2) + |
|---|
| 767 |
logFactorial(n) + logFactorial(n1 + n2 - n) - logFactorial(n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 768 |
double sum = 0; |
|---|
| 769 |
for(ulong i = x; i != startAt - 1; i--) { |
|---|
| 770 |
double oldSum = sum; |
|---|
| 771 |
sum += exp(constPart - logFactorial(i) - logFactorial(n1 - i) - |
|---|
| 772 |
logFactorial(n2 + i - n) - logFactorial(n - i)); |
|---|
| 773 |
if(isIdentical(sum, oldSum)) { // At full machine precision. |
|---|
| 774 |
break; |
|---|
| 775 |
} |
|---|
| 776 |
} |
|---|
| 777 |
return sum; |
|---|
| 778 |
} |
|---|
| 779 |
|
|---|
| 780 |
double normApproxHyper(ulong x, ulong n1, ulong n2, ulong n) { |
|---|
| 781 |
double p1 = cast(double) n1 / (n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 782 |
double p2 = cast(double) n2 / (n1 + n2); |
|---|
| 783 |
double numer = x + 0.5L - n * p1; |
|---|
| 784 |
double denom = sqrt(n * p1 * p2 * (n1 + n2 - n) / (n1 + n2 - 1)); |
|---|
| 785 |
return normalCDF(numer / denom); |
|---|
| 786 |
} |
|---|
| 787 |
|
|---|
| 788 |
// Aliases for old names. Not documented because new names should be used. |
|---|
| 789 |
alias chiSquareCDF chiSqrCDF; |
|---|
| 790 |
alias chiSquareCDFR chiSqrCDFR; |
|---|
| 791 |
alias invChiSquareCDFR invChiSqCDFR; |
|---|
| 792 |
|
|---|
| 793 |
/// |
|---|
| 794 |
double chiSquarePDF(double x, double v) { |
|---|
| 795 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >= 0 in chi-square distribution."); |
|---|
| 796 |
dstatsEnforce(v >= 1.0, "Must have at least 1 degree of freedom for chi-square."); |
|---|
| 797 |
|
|---|
| 798 |
// Calculate in log space for stability. |
|---|
| 799 |
immutable logX = log(x); |
|---|
| 800 |
immutable numerator = logX * (0.5 * v - 1) - 0.5 * x; |
|---|
| 801 |
immutable denominator = LN2 * (0.5 * v) + lgamma(0.5 * v); |
|---|
| 802 |
return exp(numerator - denominator); |
|---|
| 803 |
} |
|---|
| 804 |
|
|---|
| 805 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 806 |
assert( approxEqual(chiSquarePDF(1, 2), 0.3032653)); |
|---|
| 807 |
assert( approxEqual(chiSquarePDF(2, 1), 0.1037769)); |
|---|
| 808 |
} |
|---|
| 809 |
|
|---|
| 810 |
/** |
|---|
| 811 |
* $(POWER χ,2) distribution function and its complement. |
|---|
| 812 |
* |
|---|
| 813 |
* Returns the area under the left hand tail (from 0 to x) |
|---|
| 814 |
* of the Chi square probability density function with |
|---|
| 815 |
* v degrees of freedom. The complement returns the area under |
|---|
| 816 |
* the right hand tail (from x to ∞). |
|---|
| 817 |
* |
|---|
| 818 |
* chiSquareCDF(x | v) = ($(INTEGRATE 0, x) |
|---|
| 819 |
* $(POWER t, v/2-1) $(POWER e, -t/2) dt ) |
|---|
| 820 |
* / $(POWER 2, v/2) $(GAMMA)(v/2) |
|---|
| 821 |
* |
|---|
| 822 |
* chiSquareCDFR(x | v) = ($(INTEGRATE x, ∞) |
|---|
| 823 |
* $(POWER t, v/2-1) $(POWER e, -t/2) dt ) |
|---|
| 824 |
* / $(POWER 2, v/2) $(GAMMA)(v/2) |
|---|
| 825 |
* |
|---|
| 826 |
* Params: |
|---|
| 827 |
* v = degrees of freedom. Must be positive. |
|---|
| 828 |
* x = the $(POWER χ,2) variable. Must be positive. |
|---|
| 829 |
* |
|---|
| 830 |
*/ |
|---|
| 831 |
double chiSquareCDF(double x, double v) { |
|---|
| 832 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >= 0 in chi-square distribution."); |
|---|
| 833 |
dstatsEnforce(v >= 1.0, "Must have at least 1 degree of freedom for chi-square."); |
|---|
| 834 |
|
|---|
| 835 |
// These are very common special cases where we can make the calculation |
|---|
| 836 |
// a lot faster and/or more accurate. |
|---|
| 837 |
if(v == 1) { |
|---|
| 838 |
// Then it's the square of a normal(0, 1). |
|---|
| 839 |
return 1.0L - erfc(sqrt(x) * SQRT1_2); |
|---|
| 840 |
} else if(v == 2) { |
|---|
| 841 |
// Then it's an exponential w/ lambda == 1/2. |
|---|
| 842 |
return 1.0L - exp(-0.5 * x); |
|---|
| 843 |
} else { |
|---|
| 844 |
return gammaIncomplete(0.5 * v, 0.5 * x); |
|---|
| 845 |
} |
|---|
| 846 |
} |
|---|
| 847 |
|
|---|
| 848 |
/// |
|---|
| 849 |
double chiSquareCDFR(double x, double v) { |
|---|
| 850 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >= 0 in chi-square distribution."); |
|---|
| 851 |
dstatsEnforce(v >= 1.0, "Must have at least 1 degree of freedom for chi-square."); |
|---|
| 852 |
|
|---|
| 853 |
// These are very common special cases where we can make the calculation |
|---|
| 854 |
// a lot faster and/or more accurate. |
|---|
| 855 |
if(v == 1) { |
|---|
| 856 |
// Then it's the square of a normal(0, 1). |
|---|
| 857 |
return erfc(sqrt(x) * SQRT1_2); |
|---|
| 858 |
} else if(v == 2) { |
|---|
| 859 |
// Then it's an exponential w/ lambda == 1/2. |
|---|
| 860 |
return exp(-0.5 * x); |
|---|
| 861 |
} else { |
|---|
| 862 |
return gammaIncompleteCompl(0.5 * v, 0.5 * x); |
|---|
| 863 |
} |
|---|
| 864 |
} |
|---|
| 865 |
|
|---|
| 866 |
/** |
|---|
| 867 |
* Inverse of complemented $(POWER χ, 2) distribution |
|---|
| 868 |
* |
|---|
| 869 |
* Finds the $(POWER χ, 2) argument x such that the integral |
|---|
| 870 |
* from x to ∞ of the $(POWER χ, 2) density is equal |
|---|
| 871 |
* to the given cumulative probability p. |
|---|
| 872 |
* |
|---|
| 873 |
* Params: |
|---|
| 874 |
* p = Cumulative probability. 0<= p <=1. |
|---|
| 875 |
* v = Degrees of freedom. Must be positive. |
|---|
| 876 |
* |
|---|
| 877 |
*/ |
|---|
| 878 |
double invChiSquareCDFR(double v, double p) { |
|---|
| 879 |
dstatsEnforce(v >= 1.0, "Must have at least 1 degree of freedom for chi-square."); |
|---|
| 880 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 881 |
return 2.0 * gammaIncompleteComplInverse( 0.5*v, p); |
|---|
| 882 |
} |
|---|
| 883 |
|
|---|
| 884 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 885 |
assert(feqrel(chiSqrCDFR(invChiSqCDFR(3.5, 0.1), 3.5), 0.1)>=double.mant_dig-3); |
|---|
| 886 |
assert(approxEqual( |
|---|
| 887 |
chiSqrCDF(0.4L, 19.02L) + chiSqrCDFR(0.4L, 19.02L), 1.0L)); |
|---|
| 888 |
assert(ae( invChiSqCDFR( 3, chiSqrCDFR(1, 3)), 1)); |
|---|
| 889 |
|
|---|
| 890 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDFR(0.2, 1), 0.6547208)); |
|---|
| 891 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDFR(0.2, 2), 0.9048374)); |
|---|
| 892 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDFR(0.8, 1), 0.3710934)); |
|---|
| 893 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDFR(0.8, 2), 0.67032)); |
|---|
| 894 |
|
|---|
| 895 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDF(0.2, 1), 0.3452792)); |
|---|
| 896 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDF(0.2, 2), 0.09516258)); |
|---|
| 897 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDF(0.8, 1), 0.6289066)); |
|---|
| 898 |
assert(ae(chiSquareCDF(0.8, 2), 0.3296800)); |
|---|
| 899 |
} |
|---|
| 900 |
|
|---|
| 901 |
/// |
|---|
| 902 |
double normalPDF(double x, double mean = 0, double sd = 1) { |
|---|
| 903 |
dstatsEnforce(sd > 0, "Standard deviation must be > 0 for normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 904 |
double dev = x - mean; |
|---|
| 905 |
return exp(-(dev * dev) / (2 * sd * sd)) / (sd * SQ2PI); |
|---|
| 906 |
} |
|---|
| 907 |
|
|---|
| 908 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 909 |
assert(approxEqual(normalPDF(3, 1, 2), 0.1209854)); |
|---|
| 910 |
} |
|---|
| 911 |
|
|---|
| 912 |
///P(X < x) for normal distribution where X is random var. |
|---|
| 913 |
double normalCDF(double x, double mean = 0, double stdev = 1) { |
|---|
| 914 |
dstatsEnforce(stdev > 0, "Standard deviation must be > 0 for normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 915 |
|
|---|
| 916 |
// Using a slightly non-obvious implementation in terms of erfc because |
|---|
| 917 |
// it seems more accurate than erf for very small values of Z. |
|---|
| 918 |
|
|---|
| 919 |
double Z = (-x + mean) / stdev; |
|---|
| 920 |
return erfc(Z*SQRT1_2)/2; |
|---|
| 921 |
} |
|---|
| 922 |
|
|---|
| 923 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 924 |
assert(approxEqual(normalCDF(2), .9772498)); |
|---|
| 925 |
assert(approxEqual(normalCDF(-2), .02275013)); |
|---|
| 926 |
assert(approxEqual(normalCDF(1.3), .90319951)); |
|---|
| 927 |
} |
|---|
| 928 |
|
|---|
| 929 |
///P(X > x) for normal distribution where X is random var. |
|---|
| 930 |
double normalCDFR(double x, double mean = 0, double stdev = 1) { |
|---|
| 931 |
dstatsEnforce(stdev > 0, "Standard deviation must be > 0 for normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 932 |
|
|---|
| 933 |
double Z = (x - mean) / stdev; |
|---|
| 934 |
return erfc(Z * SQRT1_2) / 2; |
|---|
| 935 |
} |
|---|
| 936 |
|
|---|
| 937 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 938 |
//Should be essentially a mirror image of normalCDF. |
|---|
| 939 |
for(double i = -8; i < 8; i += .1) { |
|---|
| 940 |
assert(approxEqual(normalCDF(i), normalCDFR(-i))); |
|---|
| 941 |
} |
|---|
| 942 |
} |
|---|
| 943 |
|
|---|
| 944 |
enum real SQRT2PI = 0x1.40d931ff62705966p+1; // 2.5066282746310005024 |
|---|
| 945 |
enum real EXP_2 = 0.13533528323661269189L; /* exp(-2) */ |
|---|
| 946 |
|
|---|
| 947 |
private { |
|---|
| 948 |
immutable real P0[8] = [ |
|---|
| 949 |
-0x1.758f4d969484bfdcp-7, // -0.011400139698853582732 |
|---|
| 950 |
0x1.53cee17a59259dd2p-3, // 0.16592193750979583221 |
|---|
| 951 |
-0x1.ea01e4400a9427a2p-1, // -0.95704568177942689081 |
|---|
| 952 |
0x1.61f7504a0105341ap+1, // 2.7653599130008302859 |
|---|
| 953 |
-0x1.09475a594d0399f6p+2, // -4.1449800369337538286 |
|---|
| 954 |
0x1.7c59e7a0df99e3e2p+1, // 2.971493676711545292 |
|---|
| 955 |
-0x1.87a81da52edcdf14p-1, // -0.76495449677843806914 |
|---|
| 956 |
0x1.1fb149fd3f83600cp-7 // 0.0087796794200550691607 |
|---|
| 957 |
]; |
|---|
| 958 |
|
|---|
| 959 |
immutable real Q0[8] = [ |
|---|
| 960 |
-0x1.64b92ae791e64bb2p-7, // -0.010886331510064192632 |
|---|
| 961 |
0x1.7585c7d597298286p-3, // 0.1823840725000038842 |
|---|
| 962 |
-0x1.40011be4f7591ce6p+0, // -1.2500169214248199725 |
|---|
| 963 |
0x1.1fc067d8430a425ep+2, // 4.4961185085232139506 |
|---|
| 964 |
-0x1.21008ffb1e7ccdf2p+3, // -9.0313186554593813887 |
|---|
| 965 |
0x1.3d1581cf9bc12fccp+3, // 9.9088753752567182205 |
|---|
| 966 |
-0x1.53723a89fd8f083cp+2, // -5.3038469646037218604 |
|---|
| 967 |
0x1p+0 // 1 |
|---|
| 968 |
]; |
|---|
| 969 |
|
|---|
| 970 |
immutable real P1[10] = [ |
|---|
| 971 |
0x1.20ceea49ea142f12p-13, // 0.00013771451113809605662 |
|---|
| 972 |
0x1.cbe8a7267aea80bp-7, // 0.014035302749980729871 |
|---|
| 973 |
0x1.79fea765aa787c48p-2, // 0.36913549001712241224 |
|---|
| 974 |
0x1.d1f59faa1f4c4864p+1, // 3.6403083401370131097 |
|---|
| 975 |
0x1.1c22e426a013bb96p+4, // 17.75851836288460008 |
|---|
| 976 |
0x1.a8675a0c51ef3202p+5, // 53.050464721918523919 |
|---|
| 977 |
0x1.75782c4f83614164p+6, // 93.367356531518738722 |
|---|
| 978 |
0x1.7a2f3d90948f1666p+6, // 94.546133288447683183 |
|---|
| 979 |
0x1.5cd116ee4c088c3ap+5, // 43.602094518370966827 |
|---|
| 980 |
0x1.1361e3eb6e3cc20ap+2 // 4.3028497504355521807 |
|---|
| 981 |
]; |
|---|
| 982 |
|
|---|
| 983 |
immutable real Q1[10] = [ |
|---|
| 984 |
0x1.3a4ce1406cea98fap-13, // 0.00014987006762866754669 |
|---|
| 985 |
0x1.f45332623335cda2p-7, // 0.015268706895221911913 |
|---|
| 986 |
0x1.98f28bbd4b98db1p-2, // 0.39936273901812389627 |
|---|
| 987 |
0x1.ec3b24f9c698091cp+1, // 3.8455549449546995474 |
|---|
| 988 |
0x1.1cc56ecda7cf58e4p+4, // 17.79820137342627204 |
|---|
| 989 |
0x1.92c6f7376bf8c058p+5, // 50.347151215536627131 |
|---|
| 990 |
0x1.4154c25aa47519b4p+6, // 80.332772651946720635 |
|---|
| 991 |
0x1.1b321d3b927849eap+6, // 70.798939638914882544 |
|---|
| 992 |
0x1.403a5f5a4ce7b202p+4, // 20.014251091705301368 |
|---|
| 993 |
0x1p+0 // 1 |
|---|
| 994 |
]; |
|---|
| 995 |
|
|---|
| 996 |
immutable real P2[8] = [ |
|---|
| 997 |
0x1.8c124a850116a6d8p-21, // 7.3774056430545041787e-07 |
|---|
| 998 |
0x1.534abda3c2fb90bap-13, // 0.0001617870121822776094 |
|---|
| 999 |
0x1.29a055ec93a4718cp-7, // 0.0090828342009931074419 |
|---|
| 1000 |
0x1.6468e98aad6dd474p-3, // 0.17402822927913678347 |
|---|
| 1001 |
0x1.3dab2ef4c67a601cp+0, // 1.2408933017345389353 |
|---|
| 1002 |
0x1.e1fb3a1e70c67464p+1, // 3.7654793404231444828 |
|---|
| 1003 |
0x1.b6cce8035ff57b02p+2, // 6.8562564881284157607 |
|---|
| 1004 |
0x1.9f4c9e749ff35f62p+1 // 3.2445257253129069325 |
|---|
| 1005 |
]; |
|---|
| 1006 |
|
|---|
| 1007 |
immutable real Q2[8] = [ |
|---|
| 1008 |
0x1.af03f4fc0655e006p-21, // 8.0282885006885383316e-07 |
|---|
| 1009 |
0x1.713192048d11fb2p-13, // 0.00017604524340842589303 |
|---|
| 1010 |
0x1.4357e5bbf5fef536p-7, // 0.0098676559208996361084 |
|---|
| 1011 |
0x1.7fdac8749985d43cp-3, // 0.18742901426157036096 |
|---|
| 1012 |
0x1.4a080c813a2d8e84p+0, // 1.2891853156563028786 |
|---|
| 1013 |
0x1.c3a4b423cdb41bdap+1, // 3.528463857156936774 |
|---|
| 1014 |
0x1.8160694e24b5557ap+2, // 6.0215094817275106307 |
|---|
| 1015 |
0x1p+0 // 1 |
|---|
| 1016 |
]; |
|---|
| 1017 |
|
|---|
| 1018 |
immutable real P3[8] = [ |
|---|
| 1019 |
-0x1.55da447ae3806168p-34, // -7.7728283809481633868e-11 |
|---|
| 1020 |
-0x1.145635641f8778a6p-24, // -6.4339663876133447143e-08 |
|---|
| 1021 |
-0x1.abf46d6b48040128p-17, // -1.2754046756102807876e-05 |
|---|
| 1022 |
-0x1.7da550945da790fcp-11, // -0.00072793152007373443093 |
|---|
| 1023 |
-0x1.aa0b2a31157775fap-8, // -0.0065009096152460679857 |
|---|
| 1024 |
0x1.b11d97522eed26bcp-3, // 0.21148222178987070632 |
|---|
| 1025 |
0x1.1106d22f9ae89238p+1, // 2.1330206615874130532 |
|---|
| 1026 |
0x1.029a358e1e630f64p+1 // 2.0203310913027725356 |
|---|
| 1027 |
]; |
|---|
| 1028 |
|
|---|
| 1029 |
immutable real Q3[8] = [ |
|---|
| 1030 |
-0x1.74022dd5523e6f84p-34, // -8.4584942637876803775e-11 |
|---|
| 1031 |
-0x1.2cb60d61e29ee836p-24, // -7.0014768675591937804e-08 |
|---|
| 1032 |
-0x1.d19e6ec03a85e556p-17, // -1.3876523894802171788e-05 |
|---|
| 1033 |
-0x1.9ea2a7b4422f6502p-11, // -0.00079085420887378582886 |
|---|
| 1034 |
-0x1.c54b1e852f107162p-8, // -0.0069167088997199649828 |
|---|
| 1035 |
0x1.e05268dd3c07989ep-3, // 0.23453218388704381964 |
|---|
| 1036 |
0x1.239c6aff14afbf82p+1, // 2.2782109971534491995 |
|---|
| 1037 |
0x1p+0 // 1 |
|---|
| 1038 |
]; |
|---|
| 1039 |
|
|---|
| 1040 |
} |
|---|
| 1041 |
|
|---|
| 1042 |
/****************************** |
|---|
| 1043 |
* Inverse of Normal distribution function |
|---|
| 1044 |
* |
|---|
| 1045 |
* Returns the argument, x, for which the area under the |
|---|
| 1046 |
* Normal probability density function (integrated from |
|---|
| 1047 |
* minus infinity to x) is equal to p. |
|---|
| 1048 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1049 |
double invNormalCDF(double p, double mean = 0, double sd = 1) { |
|---|
| 1050 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 1051 |
dstatsEnforce(sd > 0, "Standard deviation must be > 0 for normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 1052 |
|
|---|
| 1053 |
if (p == 0.0L) { |
|---|
| 1054 |
return -double.infinity; |
|---|
| 1055 |
} |
|---|
| 1056 |
if( p == 1.0L ) { |
|---|
| 1057 |
return double.infinity; |
|---|
| 1058 |
} |
|---|
| 1059 |
double x, z, y2, x0, x1; |
|---|
| 1060 |
int code = 1; |
|---|
| 1061 |
double y = p; |
|---|
| 1062 |
if( y > (1.0L - EXP_2) ) { |
|---|
| 1063 |
y = 1.0L - y; |
|---|
| 1064 |
code = 0; |
|---|
| 1065 |
} |
|---|
| 1066 |
|
|---|
| 1067 |
if ( y > EXP_2 ) { |
|---|
| 1068 |
y = y - 0.5L; |
|---|
| 1069 |
y2 = y * y; |
|---|
| 1070 |
x = y + y * (y2 * poly( y2, P0)/poly( y2, Q0)); |
|---|
| 1071 |
x = x * SQRT2PI; |
|---|
| 1072 |
return x * sd + mean; |
|---|
| 1073 |
} |
|---|
| 1074 |
|
|---|
| 1075 |
x = sqrt( -2.0L * log(y) ); |
|---|
| 1076 |
x0 = x - log(x)/x; |
|---|
| 1077 |
z = 1.0L/x; |
|---|
| 1078 |
if( x < 8.0L ) { |
|---|
| 1079 |
x1 = z * poly( z, P1)/poly( z, Q1); |
|---|
| 1080 |
} else if( x < 32.0L ) { |
|---|
| 1081 |
x1 = z * poly( z, P2)/poly( z, Q2); |
|---|
| 1082 |
} else { |
|---|
| 1083 |
// assert(0); |
|---|
| 1084 |
x1 = z * poly( z, P3)/poly( z, Q3); |
|---|
| 1085 |
} |
|---|
| 1086 |
x = x0 - x1; |
|---|
| 1087 |
if( code != 0 ) { |
|---|
| 1088 |
x = -x; |
|---|
| 1089 |
} |
|---|
| 1090 |
return x * sd + mean; |
|---|
| 1091 |
} |
|---|
| 1092 |
|
|---|
| 1093 |
|
|---|
| 1094 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1095 |
// The values below are from Excel 2003. |
|---|
| 1096 |
assert(fabs(invNormalCDF(0.001) - (-3.09023230616779))< 0.00000000000005); |
|---|
| 1097 |
assert(fabs(invNormalCDF(1e-50) - (-14.9333375347885))< 0.00000000000005); |
|---|
| 1098 |
assert(feqrel(invNormalCDF(0.999), -invNormalCDF(0.001))>double.mant_dig-6); |
|---|
| 1099 |
|
|---|
| 1100 |
// Excel 2003 gets all the following values wrong! |
|---|
| 1101 |
assert(invNormalCDF(0.0)==-double.infinity); |
|---|
| 1102 |
assert(invNormalCDF(1.0)==double.infinity); |
|---|
| 1103 |
assert(invNormalCDF(0.5)==0); |
|---|
| 1104 |
|
|---|
| 1105 |
// I don't know the correct result for low values |
|---|
| 1106 |
// (Excel 2003 returns norminv(p) = -30 for all p < 1e-200). |
|---|
| 1107 |
// The value tested here is the one the function returned in Jan 2006. |
|---|
| 1108 |
double unknown1 = invNormalCDF(1e-250L); |
|---|
| 1109 |
assert( fabs(unknown1 -(-33.79958617269L) ) < 0.00000005); |
|---|
| 1110 |
|
|---|
| 1111 |
Random gen; |
|---|
| 1112 |
gen.seed(unpredictableSeed); |
|---|
| 1113 |
// normalCDF function trivial given ERF, unlikely to contain subtle bugs. |
|---|
| 1114 |
// Just make sure invNormalCDF works like it should as the inverse. |
|---|
| 1115 |
foreach(i; 0..1000) { |
|---|
| 1116 |
double x = uniform(0.0L, 1.0L); |
|---|
| 1117 |
double mean = uniform(0.0L, 100.0L); |
|---|
| 1118 |
double sd = uniform(1.0L, 3.0L); |
|---|
| 1119 |
double inv = invNormalCDF(x, mean, sd); |
|---|
| 1120 |
double rec = normalCDF(inv, mean, sd); |
|---|
| 1121 |
assert(approxEqual(x, rec)); |
|---|
| 1122 |
} |
|---|
| 1123 |
} |
|---|
| 1124 |
|
|---|
| 1125 |
/// |
|---|
| 1126 |
double logNormalPDF(double x, double mu = 0, double sigma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1127 |
dstatsEnforce(sigma > 0, "sigma must be > 0 for log-normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 1128 |
|
|---|
| 1129 |
immutable mulTerm = 1.0L / (x * sigma * SQ2PI); |
|---|
| 1130 |
double expTerm = log(x) - mu; |
|---|
| 1131 |
expTerm *= expTerm; |
|---|
| 1132 |
expTerm /= 2 * sigma * sigma; |
|---|
| 1133 |
return mulTerm * exp(-expTerm); |
|---|
| 1134 |
} |
|---|
| 1135 |
|
|---|
| 1136 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1137 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 1138 |
assert(approxEqual(logNormalPDF(1, 0, 1), 0.3989423)); |
|---|
| 1139 |
assert(approxEqual(logNormalPDF(2, 2, 3), 0.06047173)); |
|---|
| 1140 |
} |
|---|
| 1141 |
|
|---|
| 1142 |
/// |
|---|
| 1143 |
double logNormalCDF(double x, double mu = 0, double sigma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1144 |
dstatsEnforce(sigma > 0, "sigma must be > 0 for log-normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 1145 |
|
|---|
| 1146 |
return 0.5L + 0.5L * erf((log(x) - mu) / (sigma * SQRT2)); |
|---|
| 1147 |
} |
|---|
| 1148 |
|
|---|
| 1149 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1150 |
assert(approxEqual(logNormalCDF(4), 0.9171715)); |
|---|
| 1151 |
assert(approxEqual(logNormalCDF(1, -2, 3), 0.7475075)); |
|---|
| 1152 |
} |
|---|
| 1153 |
|
|---|
| 1154 |
/// |
|---|
| 1155 |
double logNormalCDFR(double x, double mu = 0, double sigma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1156 |
dstatsEnforce(sigma > 0, "sigma must be > 0 for log-normal distribution."); |
|---|
| 1157 |
|
|---|
| 1158 |
return 0.5L - 0.5L * erf((log(x) - mu) / (sigma * SQRT2)); |
|---|
| 1159 |
} |
|---|
| 1160 |
|
|---|
| 1161 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1162 |
assert(approxEqual(logNormalCDF(4) + logNormalCDFR(4), 1)); |
|---|
| 1163 |
assert(approxEqual(logNormalCDF(1, -2, 3) + logNormalCDFR(1, -2, 3), 1)); |
|---|
| 1164 |
} |
|---|
| 1165 |
|
|---|
| 1166 |
/// |
|---|
| 1167 |
double weibullPDF(double x, double shape, double scale = 1) { |
|---|
| 1168 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be > 0 for weibull distribution."); |
|---|
| 1169 |
dstatsEnforce(scale > 0, "scale must be > 0 for weibull distribution."); |
|---|
| 1170 |
|
|---|
| 1171 |
if(x < 0) { |
|---|
| 1172 |
return 0; |
|---|
| 1173 |
} |
|---|
| 1174 |
double ret = pow(x / scale, shape - 1) * exp( -pow(x / scale, shape)); |
|---|
| 1175 |
return ret * (shape / scale); |
|---|
| 1176 |
} |
|---|
| 1177 |
|
|---|
| 1178 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1179 |
assert(approxEqual(weibullPDF(2,1,3), 0.1711390)); |
|---|
| 1180 |
} |
|---|
| 1181 |
|
|---|
| 1182 |
/// |
|---|
| 1183 |
double weibullCDF(double x, double shape, double scale = 1) { |
|---|
| 1184 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be > 0 for weibull distribution."); |
|---|
| 1185 |
dstatsEnforce(scale > 0, "scale must be > 0 for weibull distribution."); |
|---|
| 1186 |
|
|---|
| 1187 |
double exponent = pow(x / scale, shape); |
|---|
| 1188 |
return 1 - exp(-exponent); |
|---|
| 1189 |
} |
|---|
| 1190 |
|
|---|
| 1191 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1192 |
assert(approxEqual(weibullCDF(2, 3, 4), 0.1175031)); |
|---|
| 1193 |
} |
|---|
| 1194 |
|
|---|
| 1195 |
/// |
|---|
| 1196 |
double weibullCDFR(double x, double shape, double scale = 1) { |
|---|
| 1197 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be > 0 for weibull distribution."); |
|---|
| 1198 |
dstatsEnforce(scale > 0, "scale must be > 0 for weibull distribution."); |
|---|
| 1199 |
|
|---|
| 1200 |
double exponent = pow(x / scale, shape); |
|---|
| 1201 |
return exp(-exponent); |
|---|
| 1202 |
} |
|---|
| 1203 |
|
|---|
| 1204 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1205 |
assert(approxEqual(weibullCDF(2, 3, 4) + weibullCDFR(2, 3, 4), 1)); |
|---|
| 1206 |
} |
|---|
| 1207 |
|
|---|
| 1208 |
// For K-S tests in dstats.random. Todo: Flesh out. |
|---|
| 1209 |
double waldCDF(double x, double mu, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 1210 |
double sqr = sqrt(lambda / (2 * x)); |
|---|
| 1211 |
double term1 = 1 + erf(sqr * (x / mu - 1)); |
|---|
| 1212 |
double term2 = exp(2 * lambda / mu); |
|---|
| 1213 |
double term3 = 1 - erf(sqr * (x / mu + 1)); |
|---|
| 1214 |
return 0.5L * term1 + 0.5L * term2 * term3; |
|---|
| 1215 |
} |
|---|
| 1216 |
|
|---|
| 1217 |
// ditto. |
|---|
| 1218 |
double rayleighCDF(double x, double mode) { |
|---|
| 1219 |
return 1.0L - exp(-x * x / (2 * mode * mode)); |
|---|
| 1220 |
} |
|---|
| 1221 |
|
|---|
| 1222 |
/// |
|---|
| 1223 |
double studentsTPDF(double t, double df) { |
|---|
| 1224 |
dstatsEnforce(df > 0, "Student's T must have >0 degrees of freedom."); |
|---|
| 1225 |
|
|---|
| 1226 |
immutable logPart = lgamma(0.5 * df + 0.5) - lgamma(0.5 * df); |
|---|
| 1227 |
immutable term1 = exp(logPart) / sqrt(df * PI); |
|---|
| 1228 |
immutable term2 = (1.0 + t / df * t) ^^ (-0.5 * df - 0.5); |
|---|
| 1229 |
return term1 * term2; |
|---|
| 1230 |
} |
|---|
| 1231 |
|
|---|
| 1232 |
/// |
|---|
| 1233 |
double studentsTCDF(double t, double df) { |
|---|
| 1234 |
dstatsEnforce(df > 0, "Student's T must have >0 degrees of freedom."); |
|---|
| 1235 |
|
|---|
| 1236 |
double x = (t + sqrt(t * t + df)) / (2 * sqrt(t * t + df)); |
|---|
| 1237 |
return betaIncomplete(df * 0.5L, df * 0.5L, x); |
|---|
| 1238 |
} |
|---|
| 1239 |
|
|---|
| 1240 |
/// |
|---|
| 1241 |
double studentsTCDFR(double t, double df) { |
|---|
| 1242 |
return studentsTCDF(-t, df); |
|---|
| 1243 |
} |
|---|
| 1244 |
|
|---|
| 1245 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1246 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTPDF(1, 1), 0.1591549)); |
|---|
| 1247 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTPDF(3, 10), 0.0114055)); |
|---|
| 1248 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTPDF(-4, 5), 0.005123727)); |
|---|
| 1249 |
|
|---|
| 1250 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF(1, 1), 0.75)); |
|---|
| 1251 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF(1.061, 2), 0.8)); |
|---|
| 1252 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF(5.959, 5), 0.9995)); |
|---|
| 1253 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF(.667, 20), 0.75)); |
|---|
| 1254 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF(2.353, 3), 0.95)); |
|---|
| 1255 |
} |
|---|
| 1256 |
|
|---|
| 1257 |
/****************************************** |
|---|
| 1258 |
* Inverse of Student's t distribution |
|---|
| 1259 |
* |
|---|
| 1260 |
* Given probability p and degrees of freedom df, |
|---|
| 1261 |
* finds the argument t such that the one-sided |
|---|
| 1262 |
* studentsDistribution(nu,t) is equal to p. |
|---|
| 1263 |
* Used to test whether two distributions have the same |
|---|
| 1264 |
* standard deviation. |
|---|
| 1265 |
* |
|---|
| 1266 |
* Params: |
|---|
| 1267 |
* df = degrees of freedom. Must be >1 |
|---|
| 1268 |
* p = probability. 0 < p < 1 |
|---|
| 1269 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1270 |
double invStudentsTCDF(double p, double df) { |
|---|
| 1271 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 1272 |
dstatsEnforce(df > 0, "Student's T must have >0 degrees of freedom."); |
|---|
| 1273 |
|
|---|
| 1274 |
if (p==0) return -double.infinity; |
|---|
| 1275 |
if (p==1) return double.infinity; |
|---|
| 1276 |
|
|---|
| 1277 |
double rk, z; |
|---|
| 1278 |
rk = df; |
|---|
| 1279 |
|
|---|
| 1280 |
if ( p > 0.25L && p < 0.75L ) { |
|---|
| 1281 |
if ( p == 0.5L ) return 0; |
|---|
| 1282 |
z = 1.0L - 2.0L * p; |
|---|
| 1283 |
z = betaIncompleteInverse( 0.5L, 0.5L*rk, fabs(z) ); |
|---|
| 1284 |
double t = sqrt( rk*z/(1.0L-z) ); |
|---|
| 1285 |
if( p < 0.5L ) |
|---|
| 1286 |
t = -t; |
|---|
| 1287 |
return t; |
|---|
| 1288 |
} |
|---|
| 1289 |
int rflg = -1; // sign of the result |
|---|
| 1290 |
if (p >= 0.5L) { |
|---|
| 1291 |
p = 1.0L - p; |
|---|
| 1292 |
rflg = 1; |
|---|
| 1293 |
} |
|---|
| 1294 |
z = betaIncompleteInverse( 0.5L*rk, 0.5L, 2.0L*p ); |
|---|
| 1295 |
|
|---|
| 1296 |
if (z<0) return rflg * double.infinity; |
|---|
| 1297 |
return rflg * sqrt( rk/z - rk ); |
|---|
| 1298 |
} |
|---|
| 1299 |
|
|---|
| 1300 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1301 |
// The remaining values listed here are from Excel, and are unlikely to be accurate |
|---|
| 1302 |
// in the last decimal places. However, they are helpful as a sanity check. |
|---|
| 1303 |
|
|---|
| 1304 |
// Microsoft Excel 2003 gives TINV(2*(1-0.995), 10) == 3.16927267160917 |
|---|
| 1305 |
assert(approxEqual(invStudentsTCDF(0.995, 10), 3.169_272_67L)); |
|---|
| 1306 |
assert(approxEqual(invStudentsTCDF(0.6, 8), 0.261_921_096_769_043L)); |
|---|
| 1307 |
assert(approxEqual(invStudentsTCDF(0.4, 18), -0.257_123_042_655_869L)); |
|---|
| 1308 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF(invStudentsTCDF(0.4L, 18), 18), .4L)); |
|---|
| 1309 |
assert(approxEqual(studentsTCDF( invStudentsTCDF(0.9L, 11), 11), 0.9L)); |
|---|
| 1310 |
} |
|---|
| 1311 |
|
|---|
| 1312 |
/** |
|---|
| 1313 |
* The Fisher distribution, its complement, and inverse. |
|---|
| 1314 |
* |
|---|
| 1315 |
* The F density function (also known as Snedcor's density or the |
|---|
| 1316 |
* variance ratio density) is the density |
|---|
| 1317 |
* of x = (u1/df1)/(u2/df2), where u1 and u2 are random |
|---|
| 1318 |
* variables having $(POWER χ,2) distributions with df1 |
|---|
| 1319 |
* and df2 degrees of freedom, respectively. |
|---|
| 1320 |
* |
|---|
| 1321 |
* fisherCDF returns the area from zero to x under the F density |
|---|
| 1322 |
* function. The complementary function, |
|---|
| 1323 |
* fisherCDFR, returns the area from x to ∞ under the F density function. |
|---|
| 1324 |
* |
|---|
| 1325 |
* The inverse of the complemented Fisher distribution, |
|---|
| 1326 |
* invFisherCDFR, finds the argument x such that the integral |
|---|
| 1327 |
* from x to infinity of the F density is equal to the given probability y. |
|---|
| 1328 |
|
|---|
| 1329 |
* Params: |
|---|
| 1330 |
* df1 = Degrees of freedom of the first variable. Must be >= 1 |
|---|
| 1331 |
* df2 = Degrees of freedom of the second variable. Must be >= 1 |
|---|
| 1332 |
* x = Must be >= 0 |
|---|
| 1333 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1334 |
double fisherCDF(double x, double df1, double df2) { |
|---|
| 1335 |
dstatsEnforce(df1 > 0 && df2 > 0, |
|---|
| 1336 |
"Fisher distribution must have >0 degrees of freedom."); |
|---|
| 1337 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >=0 for Fisher distribution."); |
|---|
| 1338 |
|
|---|
| 1339 |
double a = cast(double)(df1); |
|---|
| 1340 |
double b = cast(double)(df2); |
|---|
| 1341 |
double w = a * x; |
|---|
| 1342 |
w = w/(b + w); |
|---|
| 1343 |
return betaIncomplete(0.5L*a, 0.5L*b, w); |
|---|
| 1344 |
} |
|---|
| 1345 |
|
|---|
| 1346 |
/** ditto */ |
|---|
| 1347 |
double fisherCDFR(double x, double df1, double df2) { |
|---|
| 1348 |
dstatsEnforce(df1 > 0 && df2 > 0, |
|---|
| 1349 |
"Fisher distribution must have >0 degrees of freedom."); |
|---|
| 1350 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >=0 for Fisher distribution."); |
|---|
| 1351 |
|
|---|
| 1352 |
double a = cast(double)(df1); |
|---|
| 1353 |
double b = cast(double)(df2); |
|---|
| 1354 |
double w = b / (b + a * x); |
|---|
| 1355 |
return betaIncomplete( 0.5L*b, 0.5L*a, w ); |
|---|
| 1356 |
} |
|---|
| 1357 |
|
|---|
| 1358 |
/** |
|---|
| 1359 |
* Inverse of complemented Fisher distribution |
|---|
| 1360 |
* |
|---|
| 1361 |
* Finds the F density argument x such that the integral |
|---|
| 1362 |
* from x to infinity of the F density is equal to the |
|---|
| 1363 |
* given probability p. |
|---|
| 1364 |
* |
|---|
| 1365 |
* This is accomplished using the inverse beta integral |
|---|
| 1366 |
* function and the relations |
|---|
| 1367 |
* |
|---|
| 1368 |
* z = betaIncompleteInverse( df2/2, df1/2, p ), |
|---|
| 1369 |
* x = df2 (1-z) / (df1 z). |
|---|
| 1370 |
* |
|---|
| 1371 |
* Note that the following relations hold for the inverse of |
|---|
| 1372 |
* the uncomplemented F distribution: |
|---|
| 1373 |
* |
|---|
| 1374 |
* z = betaIncompleteInverse( df1/2, df2/2, p ), |
|---|
| 1375 |
* x = df2 z / (df1 (1-z)). |
|---|
| 1376 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1377 |
double invFisherCDFR(double df1, double df2, double p ) { |
|---|
| 1378 |
dstatsEnforce(df1 > 0 && df2 > 0, |
|---|
| 1379 |
"Fisher distribution must have >0 degrees of freedom."); |
|---|
| 1380 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 1381 |
|
|---|
| 1382 |
double a = df1; |
|---|
| 1383 |
double b = df2; |
|---|
| 1384 |
/* Compute probability for x = 0.5. */ |
|---|
| 1385 |
double w = betaIncomplete( 0.5L*b, 0.5L*a, 0.5L ); |
|---|
| 1386 |
/* If that is greater than p, then the solution w < .5. |
|---|
| 1387 |
Otherwise, solve at 1-p to remove cancellation in (b - b*w). */ |
|---|
| 1388 |
if ( w > p || p < 0.001L) { |
|---|
| 1389 |
w = betaIncompleteInverse( 0.5L*b, 0.5L*a, p ); |
|---|
| 1390 |
return (b - b*w)/(a*w); |
|---|
| 1391 |
} else { |
|---|
| 1392 |
w = betaIncompleteInverse( 0.5L*a, 0.5L*b, 1.0L - p ); |
|---|
| 1393 |
return b*w/(a*(1.0L-w)); |
|---|
| 1394 |
} |
|---|
| 1395 |
} |
|---|
| 1396 |
|
|---|
| 1397 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1398 |
// fDistCompl(df1, df2, x) = Excel's FDIST(x, df1, df2) |
|---|
| 1399 |
assert(fabs(fisherCDFR(16.5, 6, 4) - 0.00858719177897249L)< 0.0000000000005L); |
|---|
| 1400 |
assert(fabs((1-fisherCDF(0.1, 12, 23)) - 0.99990562845505L)< 0.0000000000005L); |
|---|
| 1401 |
assert(fabs(invFisherCDFR(8, 34, 0.2) - 1.48267037661408L)< 0.0000000005L); |
|---|
| 1402 |
assert(fabs(invFisherCDFR(4, 16, 0.008) - 5.043_537_593_48596L)< 0.0000000005L); |
|---|
| 1403 |
// This one used to fail because of a bug in the definition of MINLOG. |
|---|
| 1404 |
assert(approxEqual(fisherCDFR(invFisherCDFR(4,16, 0.008), 4, 16), 0.008)); |
|---|
| 1405 |
} |
|---|
| 1406 |
|
|---|
| 1407 |
/// |
|---|
| 1408 |
double negBinomPMF(ulong k, ulong n, double p) { |
|---|
| 1409 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, |
|---|
| 1410 |
"p must be between 0, 1 for negative binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 1411 |
|
|---|
| 1412 |
return exp(logNcomb(k - 1 + n, k) + n * log(p) + k * log(1 - p)); |
|---|
| 1413 |
} |
|---|
| 1414 |
|
|---|
| 1415 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1416 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 1417 |
assert(approxEqual(negBinomPMF(1, 8, 0.7), 0.1383552)); |
|---|
| 1418 |
assert(approxEqual(negBinomPMF(3, 2, 0.5), 0.125)); |
|---|
| 1419 |
} |
|---|
| 1420 |
|
|---|
| 1421 |
|
|---|
| 1422 |
/********************** |
|---|
| 1423 |
* Negative binomial distribution. |
|---|
| 1424 |
* |
|---|
| 1425 |
* Returns the sum of the terms 0 through k of the negative |
|---|
| 1426 |
* binomial distribution: |
|---|
| 1427 |
* |
|---|
| 1428 |
* $(BIGSUM j=0, k) $(CHOOSE n+j-1, j) $(POWER p, n) $(POWER (1-p), j) |
|---|
| 1429 |
* ???? In mathworld, it is |
|---|
| 1430 |
* $(BIGSUM j=0, k) $(CHOOSE n+j-1, j-1) $(POWER p, j) $(POWER (1-p), n) |
|---|
| 1431 |
* |
|---|
| 1432 |
* In a sequence of Bernoulli trials, this is the probability |
|---|
| 1433 |
* that k or fewer failures precede the n-th success. |
|---|
| 1434 |
* |
|---|
| 1435 |
* The arguments must be positive, with 0 < p < 1 and r>0. |
|---|
| 1436 |
* |
|---|
| 1437 |
* The Geometric Distribution is a special case of the negative binomial |
|---|
| 1438 |
* distribution. |
|---|
| 1439 |
* ----------------------- |
|---|
| 1440 |
* geometricDistribution(k, p) = negativeBinomialDistribution(k, 1, p); |
|---|
| 1441 |
* ----------------------- |
|---|
| 1442 |
* References: |
|---|
| 1443 |
* $(LINK http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NegativeBinomialDistribution.html) |
|---|
| 1444 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1445 |
double negBinomCDF(ulong k, ulong n, double p ) { |
|---|
| 1446 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, |
|---|
| 1447 |
"p must be between 0, 1 for negative binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 1448 |
if ( k == 0 ) return pow(p, cast(double) n); |
|---|
| 1449 |
return betaIncomplete( n, k + 1, p ); |
|---|
| 1450 |
} |
|---|
| 1451 |
|
|---|
| 1452 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1453 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 1454 |
assert(approxEqual(negBinomCDF(50, 50, 0.5), 0.5397946)); |
|---|
| 1455 |
assert(approxEqual(negBinomCDF(2, 1, 0.5), 0.875)); |
|---|
| 1456 |
} |
|---|
| 1457 |
|
|---|
| 1458 |
/**Probability that k or more failures precede the nth success.*/ |
|---|
| 1459 |
double negBinomCDFR(ulong k, ulong n, double p) { |
|---|
| 1460 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, |
|---|
| 1461 |
"p must be between 0, 1 for negative binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 1462 |
|
|---|
| 1463 |
if(k == 0) |
|---|
| 1464 |
return 1; |
|---|
| 1465 |
return betaIncomplete(k, n, 1.0L - p); |
|---|
| 1466 |
} |
|---|
| 1467 |
|
|---|
| 1468 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1469 |
assert(approxEqual(negBinomCDFR(10, 20, 0.5), 1 - negBinomCDF(9, 20, 0.5))); |
|---|
| 1470 |
} |
|---|
| 1471 |
|
|---|
| 1472 |
/// |
|---|
| 1473 |
ulong invNegBinomCDF(double pVal, ulong n, double p) { |
|---|
| 1474 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, |
|---|
| 1475 |
"p must be between 0, 1 for negative binomial distribution."); |
|---|
| 1476 |
dstatsEnforce(pVal >= 0 && pVal <= 1, |
|---|
| 1477 |
"P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 1478 |
|
|---|
| 1479 |
// Normal or gamma approx, then adjust. |
|---|
| 1480 |
double mean = n * (1 - p) / p; |
|---|
| 1481 |
double var = n * (1 - p) / (p * p); |
|---|
| 1482 |
double skew = (2 - p) / sqrt(n * (1 - p)); |
|---|
| 1483 |
double kk = 4.0L / (skew * skew); |
|---|
| 1484 |
double theta = sqrt(var / kk); |
|---|
| 1485 |
double offset = (kk * theta) - mean + 0.5L; |
|---|
| 1486 |
ulong guess; |
|---|
| 1487 |
|
|---|
| 1488 |
// invGammaCDFR is very expensive, but worth it in cases where normal approx |
|---|
| 1489 |
// would be the worst. Otherwise, use normal b/c it's *MUCH* cheaper to |
|---|
| 1490 |
// calculate. |
|---|
| 1491 |
if(skew > 1.5 && var > 1_048_576) |
|---|
| 1492 |
guess = cast(long) max(round( |
|---|
| 1493 |
invGammaCDFR(1 - pVal, 1 / theta, kk) - offset), 0.0L); |
|---|
| 1494 |
else |
|---|
| 1495 |
guess = cast(long) max(round( |
|---|
| 1496 |
invNormalCDF(pVal, mean, sqrt(var)) + 0.5), 0.0L); |
|---|
| 1497 |
|
|---|
| 1498 |
// This is pretty arbitrary behavior, but I don't want to use exceptions |
|---|
| 1499 |
// and it has to be handled as a special case. |
|---|
| 1500 |
if(pVal > 1 - double.epsilon) |
|---|
| 1501 |
return ulong.max; |
|---|
| 1502 |
double guessP = negBinomCDF(guess, n, p); |
|---|
| 1503 |
|
|---|
| 1504 |
if(guessP == pVal) { |
|---|
| 1505 |
return guess; |
|---|
| 1506 |
} else if(guessP < pVal) { |
|---|
| 1507 |
for(ulong k = guess + 1; ; k++) { |
|---|
| 1508 |
double newP = guessP + negBinomPMF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 1509 |
// Test for aliasing. |
|---|
| 1510 |
if(newP == guessP) |
|---|
| 1511 |
return k - 1; |
|---|
| 1512 |
if(abs(pVal - newP) > abs(guessP - pVal)) { |
|---|
| 1513 |
return k - 1; |
|---|
| 1514 |
} else if(newP >= 1) { |
|---|
| 1515 |
return k; |
|---|
| 1516 |
} else { |
|---|
| 1517 |
guessP = newP; |
|---|
| 1518 |
} |
|---|
| 1519 |
} |
|---|
| 1520 |
} else { |
|---|
| 1521 |
for(ulong k = guess - 1; guess != ulong.max; k--) { |
|---|
| 1522 |
double newP = guessP - negBinomPMF(k + 1, n, p); |
|---|
| 1523 |
// Test for aliasing. |
|---|
| 1524 |
if(newP == guessP) |
|---|
| 1525 |
return k + 1; |
|---|
| 1526 |
if(abs(newP - pVal) > abs(guessP - pVal)) { |
|---|
| 1527 |
return k + 1; |
|---|
| 1528 |
} else { |
|---|
| 1529 |
guessP = newP; |
|---|
| 1530 |
} |
|---|
| 1531 |
} |
|---|
| 1532 |
return 0; |
|---|
| 1533 |
} |
|---|
| 1534 |
} |
|---|
| 1535 |
|
|---|
| 1536 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1537 |
Random gen = Random(unpredictableSeed); |
|---|
| 1538 |
uint nSkipped; |
|---|
| 1539 |
foreach(i; 0..1000) { |
|---|
| 1540 |
uint n = uniform(1u, 10u); |
|---|
| 1541 |
double p = uniform(0.0L, 1L); |
|---|
| 1542 |
uint k = uniform(0, 20); |
|---|
| 1543 |
double pVal = negBinomCDF(k, n, p); |
|---|
| 1544 |
|
|---|
| 1545 |
// In extreme tails, p-values can alias, giving incorrect results. |
|---|
| 1546 |
// This is a corner case that nothing can be done about. Just skip |
|---|
| 1547 |
// these. |
|---|
| 1548 |
if(pVal >= 1 - 10 * double.epsilon) { |
|---|
| 1549 |
nSkipped++; |
|---|
| 1550 |
continue; |
|---|
| 1551 |
} |
|---|
| 1552 |
assert(invNegBinomCDF(pVal, n, p) == k); |
|---|
| 1553 |
} |
|---|
| 1554 |
} |
|---|
| 1555 |
|
|---|
| 1556 |
/// |
|---|
| 1557 |
double exponentialPDF(double x, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 1558 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1559 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "lambda must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1560 |
|
|---|
| 1561 |
return lambda * exp(-lambda * x); |
|---|
| 1562 |
} |
|---|
| 1563 |
|
|---|
| 1564 |
/// |
|---|
| 1565 |
double exponentialCDF(double x, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 1566 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1567 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "lambda must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1568 |
|
|---|
| 1569 |
return 1.0 - exp(-lambda * x); |
|---|
| 1570 |
} |
|---|
| 1571 |
|
|---|
| 1572 |
/// |
|---|
| 1573 |
double exponentialCDFR(double x, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 1574 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0, "x must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1575 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "lambda must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1576 |
|
|---|
| 1577 |
return exp(-lambda * x); |
|---|
| 1578 |
} |
|---|
| 1579 |
|
|---|
| 1580 |
/// |
|---|
| 1581 |
double invExponentialCDF(double p, double lambda) { |
|---|
| 1582 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1583 |
dstatsEnforce(lambda > 0, "lambda must be >0 in exponential distribution"); |
|---|
| 1584 |
return log(-1.0 / (p - 1.0)) / lambda; |
|---|
| 1585 |
} |
|---|
| 1586 |
|
|---|
| 1587 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1588 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 1589 |
assert(approxEqual(exponentialPDF(0.75, 3), 0.3161977)); |
|---|
| 1590 |
assert(approxEqual(exponentialCDF(0.75, 3), 0.8946008)); |
|---|
| 1591 |
assert(approxEqual(exponentialCDFR(0.75, 3), 0.1053992)); |
|---|
| 1592 |
|
|---|
| 1593 |
assert(approxEqual(invExponentialCDF(0.8, 2), 0.804719)); |
|---|
| 1594 |
assert(approxEqual(invExponentialCDF(0.2, 7), 0.03187765)); |
|---|
| 1595 |
} |
|---|
| 1596 |
|
|---|
| 1597 |
/// |
|---|
| 1598 |
double gammaPDF(double x, double rate, double shape) { |
|---|
| 1599 |
dstatsEnforce(x > 0, "x must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1600 |
dstatsEnforce(rate > 0, "rate must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1601 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1602 |
|
|---|
| 1603 |
immutable scale = 1.0 / rate; |
|---|
| 1604 |
immutable firstPart = x ^^ (shape - 1); |
|---|
| 1605 |
immutable logNumer = -x / scale; |
|---|
| 1606 |
immutable logDenom = lgamma(shape) + shape * log(scale); |
|---|
| 1607 |
return firstPart * exp(logNumer - logDenom); |
|---|
| 1608 |
} |
|---|
| 1609 |
|
|---|
| 1610 |
/// |
|---|
| 1611 |
double gammaCDF(double x, double rate, double shape) { |
|---|
| 1612 |
dstatsEnforce(x > 0, "x must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1613 |
dstatsEnforce(rate > 0, "rate must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1614 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1615 |
|
|---|
| 1616 |
return gammaIncomplete(shape, rate * x); |
|---|
| 1617 |
} |
|---|
| 1618 |
|
|---|
| 1619 |
/// |
|---|
| 1620 |
double gammaCDFR(double x, double rate, double shape) { |
|---|
| 1621 |
dstatsEnforce(x > 0, "x must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1622 |
dstatsEnforce(rate > 0, "rate must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1623 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1624 |
|
|---|
| 1625 |
return gammaIncompleteCompl(shape, rate * x); |
|---|
| 1626 |
} |
|---|
| 1627 |
|
|---|
| 1628 |
/**This just calls invGammaCDFR w/ 1 - p b/c invGammaCDFR is more accurate, |
|---|
| 1629 |
* but this function is necessary for consistency. |
|---|
| 1630 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1631 |
double invGammaCDF(double p, double rate, double shape) { |
|---|
| 1632 |
return invGammaCDFR(1.0 - p, rate, shape); |
|---|
| 1633 |
} |
|---|
| 1634 |
|
|---|
| 1635 |
/// |
|---|
| 1636 |
double invGammaCDFR(double p, double rate, double shape) { |
|---|
| 1637 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1638 |
dstatsEnforce(rate > 0, "rate must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1639 |
dstatsEnforce(shape > 0, "shape must be >0 in gamma distribution."); |
|---|
| 1640 |
|
|---|
| 1641 |
double ratex = gammaIncompleteComplInverse(shape, p); |
|---|
| 1642 |
return ratex / rate; |
|---|
| 1643 |
} |
|---|
| 1644 |
|
|---|
| 1645 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1646 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaPDF(1, 2, 5), 0.1804470)); |
|---|
| 1647 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaPDF(0.5, 8, 4), 1.562935)); |
|---|
| 1648 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaPDF(3, 2, 7), 0.3212463)); |
|---|
| 1649 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaCDF(1, 2, 5), 0.05265302)); |
|---|
| 1650 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaCDFR(1, 2, 5), 0.947347)); |
|---|
| 1651 |
|
|---|
| 1652 |
double inv = invGammaCDFR(0.78, 2, 1); |
|---|
| 1653 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaCDFR(inv, 2, 1), 0.78)); |
|---|
| 1654 |
|
|---|
| 1655 |
double inv2 = invGammaCDF(0.78, 2, 1); |
|---|
| 1656 |
assert(approxEqual(gammaCDF(inv2, 2, 1), 0.78)); |
|---|
| 1657 |
} |
|---|
| 1658 |
|
|---|
| 1659 |
/// |
|---|
| 1660 |
double betaPDF(double x, double alpha, double beta) { |
|---|
| 1661 |
dstatsEnforce(alpha > 0, "Alpha must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1662 |
dstatsEnforce(beta > 0, "Beta must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1663 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0 && x <= 1, "x must be between 0, 1 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1664 |
|
|---|
| 1665 |
return x ^^ (alpha - 1) * (1 - x) ^^ (beta - 1) / |
|---|
| 1666 |
std.mathspecial.beta(alpha, beta); |
|---|
| 1667 |
} |
|---|
| 1668 |
|
|---|
| 1669 |
/// |
|---|
| 1670 |
double betaCDF(double x, double alpha, double beta) { |
|---|
| 1671 |
dstatsEnforce(alpha > 0, "Alpha must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1672 |
dstatsEnforce(beta > 0, "Beta must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1673 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0 && x <= 1, "x must be between 0, 1 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1674 |
|
|---|
| 1675 |
return std.mathspecial.betaIncomplete(alpha, beta, x); |
|---|
| 1676 |
} |
|---|
| 1677 |
|
|---|
| 1678 |
/// |
|---|
| 1679 |
double betaCDFR(double x, double alpha, double beta) { |
|---|
| 1680 |
dstatsEnforce(alpha > 0, "Alpha must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1681 |
dstatsEnforce(beta > 0, "Beta must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1682 |
dstatsEnforce(x >= 0 && x <= 1, "x must be between 0, 1 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1683 |
|
|---|
| 1684 |
return std.mathspecial.betaIncomplete(beta, alpha, 1 - x); |
|---|
| 1685 |
} |
|---|
| 1686 |
|
|---|
| 1687 |
/// |
|---|
| 1688 |
double invBetaCDF(double p, double alpha, double beta) { |
|---|
| 1689 |
dstatsEnforce(alpha > 0, "Alpha must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1690 |
dstatsEnforce(beta > 0, "Beta must be >0 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1691 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "p must be between 0, 1 for beta distribution."); |
|---|
| 1692 |
|
|---|
| 1693 |
return std.mathspecial.betaIncompleteInverse(alpha, beta, p); |
|---|
| 1694 |
} |
|---|
| 1695 |
|
|---|
| 1696 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1697 |
// Values from R. |
|---|
| 1698 |
assert(approxEqual(betaPDF(0.3, 2, 3), 1.764)); |
|---|
| 1699 |
assert(approxEqual(betaPDF(0.78, 0.9, 4), 0.03518569)); |
|---|
| 1700 |
|
|---|
| 1701 |
assert(approxEqual(betaCDF(0.3, 2, 3), 0.3483)); |
|---|
| 1702 |
assert(approxEqual(betaCDF(0.78, 0.9, 4), 0.9980752)); |
|---|
| 1703 |
|
|---|
| 1704 |
assert(approxEqual(betaCDFR(0.3, 2, 3), 0.6517)); |
|---|
| 1705 |
assert(approxEqual(betaCDFR(0.78, 0.9, 4), 0.001924818)); |
|---|
| 1706 |
|
|---|
| 1707 |
assert(approxEqual(invBetaCDF(0.3483, 2, 3), 0.3)); |
|---|
| 1708 |
assert(approxEqual(invBetaCDF(0.9980752, 0.9, 4), 0.78)); |
|---|
| 1709 |
} |
|---|
| 1710 |
|
|---|
| 1711 |
/** |
|---|
| 1712 |
The Dirichlet probability density. |
|---|
| 1713 |
|
|---|
| 1714 |
Params: |
|---|
| 1715 |
|
|---|
| 1716 |
x = An input range of observed values. All must be between [0, 1]. They |
|---|
| 1717 |
must also sum to 1, though this is not checked because small deviations from |
|---|
| 1718 |
this may result due to numerical error. |
|---|
| 1719 |
|
|---|
| 1720 |
alpha = A forward range of parameters. This must have the same length as |
|---|
| 1721 |
x. |
|---|
| 1722 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1723 |
double dirichletPDF(X, A)(X x, A alpha) |
|---|
| 1724 |
if(isInputRange!X && isForwardRange!A && is(ElementType!X : double) && |
|---|
| 1725 |
is(ElementType!A : double)) { |
|---|
| 1726 |
|
|---|
| 1727 |
// Evaluating the multinomial beta function = product(gamma(alpha_1)) over |
|---|
| 1728 |
// gamma(sum(alpha)), in log space. |
|---|
| 1729 |
double logNormalizer = 0; |
|---|
| 1730 |
double sumAlpha = 0; |
|---|
| 1731 |
|
|---|
| 1732 |
foreach(a; alpha.save) { |
|---|
| 1733 |
dstatsEnforce(a > 0, "All alpha values must be > 0 for Dirichlet distribution."); |
|---|
| 1734 |
logNormalizer += lgamma(a); |
|---|
| 1735 |
sumAlpha += a; |
|---|
| 1736 |
} |
|---|
| 1737 |
|
|---|
| 1738 |
logNormalizer -= lgamma(sumAlpha); |
|---|
| 1739 |
double sum = 0; |
|---|
| 1740 |
foreach(xElem, a; lockstep(x, alpha)) { |
|---|
| 1741 |
dstatsEnforce(xElem > 0, "All x values must be > 0 for Dirichlet distribution."); |
|---|
| 1742 |
sum += log(xElem) * (a - 1); |
|---|
| 1743 |
} |
|---|
| 1744 |
|
|---|
| 1745 |
sum -= logNormalizer; |
|---|
| 1746 |
return exp(sum); |
|---|
| 1747 |
} |
|---|
| 1748 |
|
|---|
| 1749 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1750 |
// Test against beta |
|---|
| 1751 |
assert(approxEqual(dirichletPDF([0.1, 0.9], [2, 3]), betaPDF(0.1, 2, 3))); |
|---|
| 1752 |
|
|---|
| 1753 |
// A few values from R's gregmisc package |
|---|
| 1754 |
assert(approxEqual(dirichletPDF([0.1, 0.2, 0.7], [4, 5, 6]), 1.356672)); |
|---|
| 1755 |
assert(approxEqual(dirichletPDF([0.8, 0.05, 0.15], [8, 5, 6]), 0.04390199)); |
|---|
| 1756 |
} |
|---|
| 1757 |
|
|---|
| 1758 |
/// |
|---|
| 1759 |
double cauchyPDF(double X, double X0 = 0, double gamma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1760 |
dstatsEnforce(gamma > 0, "gamma must be > 0 for Cauchy distribution."); |
|---|
| 1761 |
|
|---|
| 1762 |
double toSquare = (X - X0) / gamma; |
|---|
| 1763 |
return 1.0L / ( |
|---|
| 1764 |
PI * gamma * (1 + toSquare * toSquare)); |
|---|
| 1765 |
} |
|---|
| 1766 |
|
|---|
| 1767 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1768 |
assert(approxEqual(cauchyPDF(5), 0.01224269)); |
|---|
| 1769 |
assert(approxEqual(cauchyPDF(2), 0.06366198)); |
|---|
| 1770 |
} |
|---|
| 1771 |
|
|---|
| 1772 |
|
|---|
| 1773 |
/// |
|---|
| 1774 |
double cauchyCDF(double X, double X0 = 0, double gamma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1775 |
dstatsEnforce(gamma > 0, "gamma must be > 0 for Cauchy distribution."); |
|---|
| 1776 |
|
|---|
| 1777 |
return M_1_PI * atan((X - X0) / gamma) + 0.5L; |
|---|
| 1778 |
} |
|---|
| 1779 |
|
|---|
| 1780 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1781 |
// Values from R |
|---|
| 1782 |
assert(approxEqual(cauchyCDF(-10), 0.03172552)); |
|---|
| 1783 |
assert(approxEqual(cauchyCDF(1), 0.75)); |
|---|
| 1784 |
} |
|---|
| 1785 |
|
|---|
| 1786 |
/// |
|---|
| 1787 |
double cauchyCDFR(double X, double X0 = 0, double gamma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1788 |
dstatsEnforce(gamma > 0, "gamma must be > 0 for Cauchy distribution."); |
|---|
| 1789 |
|
|---|
| 1790 |
return M_1_PI * atan((X0 - X) / gamma) + 0.5L; |
|---|
| 1791 |
} |
|---|
| 1792 |
|
|---|
| 1793 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1794 |
// Values from R |
|---|
| 1795 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - cauchyCDFR(-10), 0.03172552)); |
|---|
| 1796 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - cauchyCDFR(1), 0.75)); |
|---|
| 1797 |
} |
|---|
| 1798 |
|
|---|
| 1799 |
/// |
|---|
| 1800 |
double invCauchyCDF(double p, double X0 = 0, double gamma = 1) { |
|---|
| 1801 |
dstatsEnforce(gamma > 0, "gamma must be > 0 for Cauchy distribution."); |
|---|
| 1802 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 1803 |
|
|---|
| 1804 |
return X0 + gamma * tan(PI * (p - 0.5L)); |
|---|
| 1805 |
} |
|---|
| 1806 |
|
|---|
| 1807 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1808 |
// cauchyCDF already tested. Just make sure this is the inverse. |
|---|
| 1809 |
assert(approxEqual(invCauchyCDF(cauchyCDF(.5)), .5)); |
|---|
| 1810 |
assert(approxEqual(invCauchyCDF(cauchyCDF(.99)), .99)); |
|---|
| 1811 |
assert(approxEqual(invCauchyCDF(cauchyCDF(.03)), .03)); |
|---|
| 1812 |
} |
|---|
| 1813 |
|
|---|
| 1814 |
// For K-S tests in dstats.random. To be fleshed out later. Intentionally |
|---|
| 1815 |
// lacking ddoc. |
|---|
| 1816 |
double logisticCDF(double x, double loc, double shape) { |
|---|
| 1817 |
return 1.0L / (1 + exp(-(x - loc) / shape)); |
|---|
| 1818 |
} |
|---|
| 1819 |
|
|---|
| 1820 |
/// |
|---|
| 1821 |
double laplacePDF(double x, double mu = 0, double b = 1) { |
|---|
| 1822 |
dstatsEnforce(b > 0, "b must be > 0 for laplace distribution."); |
|---|
| 1823 |
|
|---|
| 1824 |
return (exp(-abs(x - mu) / b)) / (2 * b); |
|---|
| 1825 |
} |
|---|
| 1826 |
|
|---|
| 1827 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1828 |
// Values from Maxima. |
|---|
| 1829 |
assert(approxEqual(laplacePDF(3, 2, 1), 0.18393972058572)); |
|---|
| 1830 |
assert(approxEqual(laplacePDF(-8, 6, 7), 0.0096668059454723)); |
|---|
| 1831 |
} |
|---|
| 1832 |
|
|---|
| 1833 |
/// |
|---|
| 1834 |
double laplaceCDF(double X, double mu = 0, double b = 1) { |
|---|
| 1835 |
dstatsEnforce(b > 0, "b must be > 0 for laplace distribution."); |
|---|
| 1836 |
|
|---|
| 1837 |
double diff = (X - mu); |
|---|
| 1838 |
double sign = (diff > 0) ? 1 : -1; |
|---|
| 1839 |
return 0.5L *(1 + sign * (1 - exp(-abs(diff) / b))); |
|---|
| 1840 |
} |
|---|
| 1841 |
|
|---|
| 1842 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1843 |
// Values from Octave. |
|---|
| 1844 |
assert(approxEqual(laplaceCDF(5), 0.9963)); |
|---|
| 1845 |
assert(approxEqual(laplaceCDF(-3.14), .021641)); |
|---|
| 1846 |
assert(approxEqual(laplaceCDF(0.012), 0.50596)); |
|---|
| 1847 |
} |
|---|
| 1848 |
|
|---|
| 1849 |
/// |
|---|
| 1850 |
double laplaceCDFR(double X, double mu = 0, double b = 1) { |
|---|
| 1851 |
dstatsEnforce(b > 0, "b must be > 0 for laplace distribution."); |
|---|
| 1852 |
|
|---|
| 1853 |
double diff = (mu - X); |
|---|
| 1854 |
double sign = (diff > 0) ? 1 : -1; |
|---|
| 1855 |
return 0.5L *(1 + sign * (1 - exp(-abs(diff) / b))); |
|---|
| 1856 |
} |
|---|
| 1857 |
|
|---|
| 1858 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1859 |
// Values from Octave. |
|---|
| 1860 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - laplaceCDFR(5), 0.9963)); |
|---|
| 1861 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - laplaceCDFR(-3.14), .021641)); |
|---|
| 1862 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - laplaceCDFR(0.012), 0.50596)); |
|---|
| 1863 |
} |
|---|
| 1864 |
|
|---|
| 1865 |
/// |
|---|
| 1866 |
double invLaplaceCDF(double p, double mu = 0, double b = 1) { |
|---|
| 1867 |
dstatsEnforce(p >= 0 && p <= 1, "P-values must be between 0, 1."); |
|---|
| 1868 |
dstatsEnforce(b > 0, "b must be > 0 for laplace distribution."); |
|---|
| 1869 |
|
|---|
| 1870 |
double p05 = p - 0.5L; |
|---|
| 1871 |
double sign = (p05 < 0) ? -1.0L : 1.0L; |
|---|
| 1872 |
return mu - b * sign * log(1.0L - 2 * abs(p05)); |
|---|
| 1873 |
} |
|---|
| 1874 |
|
|---|
| 1875 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1876 |
assert(approxEqual(invLaplaceCDF(0.012), -3.7297)); |
|---|
| 1877 |
assert(approxEqual(invLaplaceCDF(0.82), 1.0217)); |
|---|
| 1878 |
} |
|---|
| 1879 |
|
|---|
| 1880 |
|
|---|
| 1881 |
/**Kolmogorov distribution. Used in Kolmogorov-Smirnov testing. |
|---|
| 1882 |
* |
|---|
| 1883 |
* References: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov-Smirnov |
|---|
| 1884 |
*/ |
|---|
| 1885 |
double kolmDist(double X) { |
|---|
| 1886 |
dstatsEnforce(X >= 0, "X must be >= 0 for Kolmogorov distribution."); |
|---|
| 1887 |
|
|---|
| 1888 |
if(X == 0) { |
|---|
| 1889 |
//Handle as a special case. Otherwise, get NAN b/c of divide by zero. |
|---|
| 1890 |
return 0; |
|---|
| 1891 |
} |
|---|
| 1892 |
double result = 0; |
|---|
| 1893 |
double i = 1; |
|---|
| 1894 |
while(true) { |
|---|
| 1895 |
immutable delta = exp(-(2 * i - 1) * (2 * i - 1) * PI * PI / (8 * X * X)); |
|---|
| 1896 |
i++; |
|---|
| 1897 |
|
|---|
| 1898 |
immutable oldResult = result; |
|---|
| 1899 |
result += delta; |
|---|
| 1900 |
if(isNaN(result) || oldResult == result) { |
|---|
| 1901 |
break; |
|---|
| 1902 |
} |
|---|
| 1903 |
} |
|---|
| 1904 |
result *= (sqrt(2 * PI) / X); |
|---|
| 1905 |
return result; |
|---|
| 1906 |
} |
|---|
| 1907 |
|
|---|
| 1908 |
unittest { |
|---|
| 1909 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - kolmDist(.75), 0.627167)); |
|---|
| 1910 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - kolmDist(.5), 0.9639452436)); |
|---|
| 1911 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - kolmDist(.9), 0.39273070)); |
|---|
| 1912 |
assert(approxEqual(1 - kolmDist(1.2), 0.112249666)); |
|---|
| 1913 |
} |
|---|