FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Mango XML Status

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Mango
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
teqdruid



Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 390
Location: UMD

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 1:14 pm    Post subject: Mango XML Status Reply with quote

Does anyone know how the XML stuff is going? Is it usable yet? I've been sitting on some pretty decent XML-RPC code meant for Mango for some time since it uses Andy's XML parser, which isn't really a good candidate for inclusion in Mango.

Also, how does this new ICU stuff effect mango XML? I would imagine one would want the XML stuff to be somewhat coherent with the ICU stuff.

John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
kris



Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 1494
Location: South Pacific

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haven't heard anything about the XML stuff for a while. I'll check on it though ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kris



Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 1494
Location: South Pacific

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Mango XML Status Reply with quote

teqDruid wrote:
<snip> how does this new ICU stuff effect mango XML? I would imagine one would want the XML stuff to be somewhat coherent with the ICU stuff.

ICU uses wchar internally: if that's good enough for IBM/Taligent/Sun then it's probably good enough for most of us too. If the XML stuff were based upon wchar also, it could certainly leverage the ICU converters and so on. Another consideration for converters is the stuff that Ben Hinkle had poked around with. I don't know what the outcome of that was, but certainly worth the effort of isolating the conversion steps via an Interface/Factory pattern.

In some respects, it would be better to have an XML parser based upon dchar ... however, the pros and cons are heavily biased by how much text and CDATA there is in the parsed content. This would probably be notably magnified by a DOM representation of such documents.

Ideally, the wchar/dchar data-type would be typedef'd and versioned (or templated, except it would be horrific to debug a templated parser Shocked). Then, one could have their cake and eat it too!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Mango All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group