Author |
Message |
Topic: Derelict design question |
Silverclaw
Replies: 11
Views: 13417
|
Forum: Derelict Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:13 am Subject: Derelict design question |
I understand the reasoning, alas I simply wanted to reduce the number of string literals the compiler has to handle (and therefore less manifest constants), less stack allocations due to parameter pas ... |
Topic: Derelict design question |
Silverclaw
Replies: 11
Views: 13417
|
Forum: Derelict Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:56 am Subject: Re: Derelict design question |
May I ask why? (even if it is a personal preference, I'll accept that)
I had not even considered issues with the shared paradigm until they were brought up in the thread you reference. I ha ... |
Topic: Derelict design question |
Silverclaw
Replies: 11
Views: 13417
|
Forum: Derelict Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:16 am Subject: Re: Derelict design question |
The problem with version statements are that everything in them needs to be syntactically correct and "const(void)*" is not syntactically correct D1 code. That almost defeats the whole ide ... |
Topic: Derelict design question |
Silverclaw
Replies: 11
Views: 13417
|
Forum: Derelict Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:03 am Subject: Derelict design question |
I've been coding D and I used Derelict for a few years already on my projects, specially the GL and SDL packages. I also have suicidal tendencies and as such am using DMD2.
Theres been a while sinc ... |
Topic: IRC Channels |
Silverclaw
Replies: 9
Views: 33620
|
Forum: gtkD Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:21 am Subject: IRC Channels |
The above link is dead. Will it be returning? |
|